ArticleMycopathologia2006
A study on stability of phenotype and genotype of Trichophyton rubrum.
Article in Mycopathologia, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Comparative Description of Dermatophyte Genomes: A State-of-the-Art Review.Mycopathologia · 2023Pooled it
- Influence of the cultivation medium and pH on the pigmentation of Trichophyton rubrum.PloS one · 2019Article
- Molecular Strain Typing of Clinical Isolates,Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2017Article
- Stability of tandemly repetitive subelement PCR patterns in Trichophyton rubrum over serial passaging and with respect to drug pressure.Mycopathologia · 2012Article
- Strain differentiation of dermatophytes.MycopathologiaReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo explore the stability of phenotype and genotype in Trichophyton rubrum.
methodsAll the strains were cultured on Sabouraud's dextrose agar slopes, and identified to species level. Strains isolated recently were subcultured on Sabouraud agar slopes four times at an interval of 4 weeks. DNA was extracted with CTAB method. A probe consisting of 3' end of 18S rDNA, adjacent ITS1, 5.8S rDNA and ITS2 regions was amplified from template DNA of the T. rubrum standard strain using fungal universal primers NS5 and ITS4, labelled by P32 and hybridized with EcoR I-digested T. rubrum genomic DNA.
results(1) Four phenotypes were isolated from 207 T. rubrum strains, with downy type (45.4%) in the first place, and granular type not found. After 1 year of conservation, 54 strains showed morphological variations with the total variation rate of 26.1%. (2) Eleven strains showed variations in colony morphology or pigment upon subculture. (3) AP-PCR analysis of 10 T. rubrum isolates and one T. rubrum standard strain showed similar DNA patterns with main bands at 2.2, 1.7, 1.3, 0.9 and 0.7 kb. No changes in DNA pattern were found upon subculture. (4) Hybridization analysis revealed that all the 11 T. rubrum strains presented three bands and were identified into two types (2.4, 3.9, 5.9 kb and 2.4, 4.4, 6.5 kb). No changes in band pattern were found upon subculture.
conclusionsPhenotype of T. rubrum was instable and the colonial morphology and pigment easily changed during conservation or subculture, while its genotype was relatively stable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16552482What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.