Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16552042›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2006

An increase in antimycobacterial Th1-cell responses by prime-boost protocols of immunization does not enhance protection against tuberculosis.

Laleh Majlessi, Marcela Simsova, Zdenka Jarvis, Priscille Brodin, Marie-Jésus Rojas, Cécile Bauche, Clémence Nouzé, Daniel Ladant, Stewart T Cole, Peter Sebo and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Characterization ofJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Article
  12. Bioengineering ofToxins · 2021
    Review
  13. Immunization withJournal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Bioengineering ofToxins · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Laleh MajlessiBiologie des Régulations Immunitaires, Inserm, E 352, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France. lmajless@pasteur.fr
Marcela Simsova
Zdenka Jarvis
Priscille Brodin
Marie-Jésus Rojas
Cécile Bauche
Clémence Nouzé
Daniel Ladant
Stewart T Cole
Peter Sebo
Claude Leclerc
Institut Pasteur · FRCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bordetella pertussis adenylate cyclase (CyaA) toxoid is a powerful nonreplicative immunization vector targeting dendritic cells, which has already been used successfully in prophylactic and therapeutic vaccination in various preclinical animal models. Here, we investigated the potential of CyaA, harboring strong mycobacterial immunogens, i.e., the immunodominant regions of antigen 85A or the complete sequence of the 6-kDa early secreted antigenic target (ESAT-6) protein, to induce antimycobacterial immunity. By generating T-cell hybridomas or by using T cells from mice infected with mycobacteria, we first demonstrated that the in vitro delivery of 85A or ESAT-6 to antigen-presenting cells by CyaA leads to processing and presentation, by major histocompatibility complex class II molecules, of the same epitopes as those displayed upon mycobacterial infection. Importantly, compared to the recombinant protein alone, the presentation of ESAT-6 in vitro was 100 times more efficient upon its delivery to antigen-presenting cells in fusion to CyaA. Immunization with CyaA-85A or CyaA-ESAT-6 in the absence of any adjuvant induced strong antigen-specific lymphoproliferative, interleukin-2 (IL-2) and gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) cytokine responses, in the absence of any IL-4 or IL-5 production. When used as boosters after priming with a BCG expressing ESAT-6, the CyaA-85A and CyaA-ESAT-6 proteins were able to strikingly increase the sensitivity and intensity of proliferative and Th1-polarized responses and notably the frequency of antigen-specific IFN-gamma-producing CD4+ T cells. However, immunization with these CyaA constructs as subunit vaccines alone or as boosters did not allow induction or improvement of protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. These results question the broadly admitted correlation between the frequency of IFN-gamma-producing CD4+ T cells and the level of protection against tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Adenylate Cyclase ToxinAnimalsAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsBordetella pertussisEpitopes, T-LymphocyteFemaleImmunization, SecondaryImmunodominant EpitopesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred C57BLMycobacterium tuberculosisTh1 CellsTuberculosis, PulmonaryTuberculosis VaccinesAdenylate Cyclase ToxinAntigens, BacterialBacterial ProteinsEpitopes, T-LymphocyteESAT-6 protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisImmunodominant EpitopesTuberculosis VaccinesVaccines, Subunit

Identifiers

PMID16552042
PMCPMC1418924
OpenAlexW2139596692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.