Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16551762›Full record

ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2006

Evaluation of an occupational health intervention programme on whole-body vibration in forklift truck drivers: a controlled trial.

C T J Hulshof, J H A M Verbeek, I T J Braam, M Bovenzi, F J H van Dijk

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Prediction of Work-Related Risk Factors among Bus Drivers Using Machine Learning.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Reply to "raised concern".Industrial health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health effects associated with occupational exposure to hand-arm or whole body vibration.Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2018
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

C T J HulshofAcademic Medical Center, Universiteit van Amsterdam, Department: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Research Institute AmCOGG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. c.t.hulshof@amc.uva.nl
J H A M Verbeek
I T J Braam
M Bovenzi
F J H van Dijk
Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NLAcademic Medical Center · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NLUniversity of Trieste · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate process and outcome of a multifaceted occupational health intervention programme on whole-body vibration (WBV) in forklift truck drivers.

methodsAn experimental pretest/post-test control group study design. The authors trained occupational health services (OHS) in the experimental group in the use of the programme. OHS in the control group were asked to deliver care as usual. In total, 15 OHS, 32 OHS professionals, 26 companies, and 260 forklift drivers were involved. Post-test measurements were carried out one year after the start of the programme.

resultsBaseline data before the start of the programme showed no difference between experimental and control group. Results of the outcome evaluation indicate a slight, although not statistically significant, reduction of WBV exposure in the experimental group (p = 0.06). Process evaluation revealed a positive influence on company policy toward WBV, attitude and intended behaviour of forklift drivers, and a trend towards an increase in knowledge of OHS professionals and company managers. The number of observed control measures with a major impact (levelling of surface and reduction of speed) was rather low. In those cases where control measures had been taken, there was a significant reduction in WBV exposure. This limited effect of the programme might be caused by the short period of follow up and the dropout of participants. The feasibility and the usefulness of the programme within the OHS setting were rated good by the participants.

conclusionsThis programme to decrease WBV exposure was partially effective. Significant effects on intermediate objectives were observed. More research on the effectiveness of intervention in the field of WBV is needed.

Indexed as

Motor VehiclesAdultAnalysis of VarianceFeasibility StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansLow Back PainOccupational DiseasesOccupational Health ServicesPatient ComplianceVibrationWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID16551762
PMCPMC2092505
OpenAlexW2169383509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.