ArticleOccupational and environmental medicine2006
Does enhanced information exchange between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians improve patient work resumption? A controlled intervention study.
Article in Occupational and environmental medicine, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interventions regarding physicians' sickness certification practice - a systematic literature review with meta-analyses.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2022Pooled it
- Return-to-work coordination programmes for improving return to work in workers on sick leave.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2012Pooled it
- Adding value for clients during work disability assessments: A qualitative exploration from the perspective of medical examiners.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Article
- Associations Between Schemes of Social Insurance and Self-Rated Health Comparison: Evidence From the Employed Migrants in Urban China.Frontiers in public health · 2019Article
- Interprofessional Communication Concerning Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders: A Qualitative Study.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2018Article
- Article
- The development of instruments to measure the work disability assessment behaviour of insurance physicians.BMC public health · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient work resumption after sickness absence varies even among patients with similar pathologies and characteristics. Explanations remain uncertain. One newly investigated field is "information asymmetry", a situation in which critical information is not appropriately exchanged between stakeholders in disability management. It is hypothesised that information asymmetry between social insurance physicians and occupational physicians prolongs sickness absence.
objectivesTo assess the influence of enhanced information exchange between these physicians on patient outcome.
methodsNon-randomised controlled intervention study. The setting was the work inability assessment consultation of social insurance physicians in Belgium. Inclusion criteria were: employee, age 18-50, and subacute (more than one month) sickness absence. The intervention was a structured information exchange (through the use of a communication form) between the patient's social insurance physician and occupational physician. The intervention started when the patient's sickness absence reached the subacute stage, and ended when the sickness absence benefit was ceased or the duration exceeded one year. The primary outcome measure was the sickness absence benefit status of the patient assessed one year after benefit onset.
resultsOf the 1883 patients asked to enroll in the study, 1564 (84%) participated; 505 (32%) of 1564 patients were assigned to the intervention group and 1059 (68%) to the control group; 1553 (99%) of 1564 patients completed the study. In the intervention group, 86% received no sickness absence benefit at the end of the study, versus 84% in the control group (95% CI 0.91-1.15). No significant differences in other outcome parameters were obtained.
conclusionsInformation exchange between physicians may not be enough to influence work resumption among patients on sickness absence. Further research on stakeholders' information asymmetry and its effect on the outcome of patients are necessary. The complexity of information asymmetry in disability management cannot be underestimated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.