ArticleNeurotoxicology2006
What is the meaning of non-linear dose-response relationships between blood lead concentrations and IQ?
Article in Neurotoxicology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mitochondrial Toxins and Healthy Lifestyle Meet at the Crossroad of Hormesis.Diabetes & metabolism journal · 2019Review
- Selection of nonlinear interactions by a forward stepwise algorithm: Application to identifying environmental chemical mixtures affecting health outcomes.Statistics in medicine · 2019Article
- Environmental Health Sciences in a Translational Research Framework: More than Benches and Bedsides.Environmental health perspectives · 2019Article
- Persistent Organic Pollutants and Type 2 Diabetes: A Critical Review of Review Articles.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018Review
- The protean toxicities of lead: new chapters in a familiar story.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2011Review
- Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders.Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society : JINS · 2009Review
- Response to: "What is the meaning of non-linear dose-response relationships between blood lead concentrations and IQ?".Neurotoxicology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent literature [e.g. Canfield RL, Henderson CR, Cory-Slechta DA, Cox C, Jusko TA, Lanphear BP. Intellectual impairment in children with blood lead concentrations below 10mg per deciliter. New Engl J Med 2003;348(16):1517-1526; Lanphear BP, Hornung R, Khoury J, Yolton K, Baghurst P, Bellinger DC, Canfield RL, Dietrich KN, Bornschein R, Greene T, Rothenberg SJ, Needleman HL, Schnaas L, Wasserman G, Graziano J, Roberts R. Low-level environmental lead exposure and children's intellectual function: an international pooled analysis. Environ Health Perspect 2005;113(7):894-899] has suggested the existence of a supra-linear dose-response relationship between environmental measures such as blood lead concentrations and IQ. This communication explores the mathematical requirements placed on such dose-response relationships when the environmental measure, or independent variable, is lognormally distributed and the effect, or dependent variable, is normally distributed. Results of the analyses show that a supra-linear slope is a required outcome of correlations between data distributions where one is lognormally distributed and the other is normally distributed. The analysis shows that caution should be taken in assigning biological significance to supra-linear dose-response relationships in these instances. Detailed analyses of such data sets should be conducted to determine if the magnitude of supra-linear slopes are more or less than mathematically required, and from there to consider biological significance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16551479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.