Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16550218›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2006

Evidence-based research in complementary and alternative medicine II: the process of evidence-based research.

Francesco Chiappelli, Paolo Prolo, Monica Rosenblum, Myeshia Edgerton, Olivia S Cajulis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Geffen Faculty Highlight Concerns Linking CAIM and Conventional Researchers at UCLA Symposium.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2010
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Skin impedance measurements for acupuncture research: development of a continuous recording system.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2008
    Article
  11. Transitioning Toward Evidence-Based Research in the Health Sciences for the XXI Century.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2008
    Article
  12. A phase I feasibility study of yoga on the physical health and coping of informal caregivers.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2007
    Article
  13. Evaluating complex healthcare systems: a critique of four approaches.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2007
    Article
  14. Herbal medicine today: clinical and research issues.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2007
    Article
  15. Potential synergism between hypnosis and acupuncture—is the whole more than the sum of its parts?Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2007
    Article
  16. Immunology and homeopathy. 4. Clinical studies-part 1.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francesco ChiappelliDivision of Oral Biology & Medicine, UCLA School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1668, USA. chiappelli@dent.ucla.edu
Paolo Prolo
Monica Rosenblum
Myeshia Edgerton
Olivia S Cajulis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a common practice in contemporary medicine to follow stringently the scientific method in the process of validating efficacy and effectiveness of new or improved modes of treatment intervention. It follows that these complementary or alternative interventions must be validated by stringent research before they can be reliably integrated into Western medicine. The next decades will witness an increasing number of evidence-based research directed at establishing the best available evidence in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). This second paper in this lecture series examines the process of evidence-based research (EBR) in the context of CAM. We outline the fundamental principles, process and relevance of EBR, and its implication to CAM. We underscore areas of future development in EBR. We note that the main problem of applying EBR to CAM at present has to do with the fact that the contribution of EBR can be significant only to the extent to which studies used in the process of EBR are of good quality. All too often CAM research is not of sufficient quality to warrant the generation of a consensus statement. EBR, nevertheless, can contribute to CAM by identifying current weaknesses of CAM research. We present a revised instrument to assess quality of the literature.

Identifiers

PMID16550218
PMCPMC1375240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.