Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16547726›Full record

ReviewChromosoma2006

The synaptonemal complex and meiotic recombination in humans: new approaches to old questions.

Rhea U Vallente, Edith Y Cheng, Terry J Hassold

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chromosoma, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The new yeast is a mouse.PLoS biology · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Regulating double-stranded DNA break repair towards crossover or non-crossover during mammalian meiosis.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rhea U VallenteSchool of Molecular Biosciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. rhea@wsu.edu
Edith Y Cheng
Terry J Hassold
Washington State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

A Program of Research in Population CytogeneticsR37HD021341 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 2010 to 2019
$5.8M
A PROGRAM OF RESEARCH IN POPULATION CYTOGENETICSR01HD021341 · NICHD · WEILL MEDICAL COLLEGE OF CORNELL UNIV · PI HASSOLD, TERRY J · 1985 to 2009
$5.7M
NICHD NIH HHS HD21341
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Meiotic prophase serves as an arena for the interplay of two important cellular activities, meiotic recombination and synapsis of homologous chromosomes. Synapsis is mediated by the synaptonemal complex (SC), originally characterized as a structure linked to pairing of meiotic chromosomes (Moses (1958) J Biophys Biochem Cytol 4:633-638). In 1975, the first electron micrographs of human pachytene stage SCs were presented (Moses et al. (1975) Science 187:363-365) and over the next 15 years the importance of the SC to normal meiotic progression in human males and females was established (Jhanwar and Chaganti (1980) Hum Genet 54:405-408; Pathak and Elder (1980) Hum Genet 54:171-175; Solari (1980) Chromosoma 81:315-337; Speed (1984) Hum Genet 66:176-180; Wallace and Hulten (1985) Ann Hum Genet 49(Pt 3):215-226). Further, these studies made it clear that abnormalities in the assembly or maintenance of the SC were an important contributor to human infertility (Chaganti et al. (1980) Am J Hum Genet 32:833-848; Vidal et al. (1982) Hum Genet 60:301-304; Bojko (1983) Carlsberg Res Commun 48:285-305; Bojko (1985) Carlsberg Res Commun 50:43-72; Templado et al. (1984) Hum Genet 67:162-165; Navarro et al. (1986) Hum Reprod 1:523-527; Garcia et al. (1989) Hum Genet 2:147-53). However, the utility of these early studies was limited by lack of information on the structural composition of the SC and the identity of other SC-associated proteins. Fortunately, studies of the past 15 years have gone a long way toward remedying this problem. In this minireview, we highlight the most important of these advances as they pertain to human meiosis, focusing on temporal aspects of SC assembly, the relationship between the SC and meiotic recombination, and the contribution of SC abnormalities to human infertility.

Indexed as

MeiosisRecombination, GeneticFemaleHumansInfertilityMaleOocytesSpermatocytesSynaptonemal Complex

Identifiers

PMID16547726
OpenAlexW2043252739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.