ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2006
Retrotransposon sequence variation in four asexual plant species.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterization and Dynamics of Repeatomes in Closely Related Species ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Climatic differentiation in polyploid apomictic Ranunculus auricomus complex in Europe.BMC ecology · 2018Article
- The landscape and structural diversity of LTR retrotransposons in Musa genome.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2017Article
- Recent and dynamic transposable elements contribute to genomic divergence under asexuality.BMC genomics · 2016Article
- Genome-wide development of transposable elements-based markers in foxtail millet and construction of an integrated database.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2015Article
- Copia and Gypsy retrotransposons activity in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.).BMC plant biology · 2009Article
- Genomic amplification of the Gret1 retroelement in white-fruited accessions of wild vitis and interspecific hybrids.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2008Article
- The fate of transposable elements in asexual populations.Genetics · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposable elements (TEs) can be viewed as genetic parasites that persist in populations due to their capacity for increase in copy number and the inefficacy of selection against them. A corollary of this hypothesis is that TEs are more likely to spread within sexual populations and be eliminated or inactivated within asexual populations. While previous work with animals has shown that asexual taxa may contain less TE diversity than sexual taxa, comparable work with plants has been lacking. Here we report the results of a study of Ty1/copia, Ty3/gypsy, and LINE-like retroelement diversity in four asexual plant species. Retroelement-like sequences, with a high degree of conservation both within and between species, were isolated from all four species. The sequences correspond to several previously annotated retroelement subfamilies. They also exhibit a pattern of nucleotide substitution characterized by an excess of synonymous substitutions, suggestive of a history of purifying selection. These findings were compared with retroelement sequence evolution in sexual plant taxa. One likely explanation for the discovery of conserved TE sequences in the genomes of these asexual taxa is simply that asexuality within these taxa evolved relatively recently, such that the loss and breakdown of TEs is not yet detectable through analysis of sequence diversity. This explanation is examined by conducting stochastic simulation of TE evolution and by using published information to infer rough estimates of the ages of asexual taxa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16547645What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.