Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16547328›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of ophthalmology2006

Randomised controlled trial of topical ciclosporin A in steroid dependent allergic conjunctivitis.

M Daniell, M Constantinou, H T Vu, H R Taylor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 99 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Topical cyclosporine for atopic keratoconjunctivitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. A randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of tacrolimus ophthalmic suspension 0.1% in severe allergic conjunctivitis.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2010
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. A comparative study between ciclosporine A eye drop (2%) and tacrolimus eye ointment (0.03%) in management of children with refractory vernal keratoconjunctivitis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2013
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Tacrolimus Ointment for Treatment of Vernal Keratoconjunctivitis.Middle East African journal of ophthalmology
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M DaniellCentre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, Corneal Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Locked Bag 8, East Melbourne 8002, Australia. daniellm@ozemail.com.au
M Constantinou
H T Vu
H R Taylor
The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the efficacy, safety, and therapeutic effect of topical ciclosporin A 0.05% as a steroid sparing agent in steroid dependent allergic conjunctivitis.

methodsProspective, randomised, double masked, placebo controlled trial comparing signs, symptoms, and the ability to reduce or stop concurrent steroid in steroid dependent atopic keratoconjunctivitis and vernal keratoconjunctivitis using 0.05% topical ciclosporin A compared to placebo. Steroid drop usage per week (drug score), symptoms, and clinical signs scores were the main outcome measures.

resultsThe study included an enrolment of 40 patients, 18 with atopic keratoconjunctivitis and 22 with vernal keratoconjunctivitis. There was no statistical significant difference in drug score, symptoms, or clinical signs scores between the placebo and ciclosporin group at the end of the treatment period. No adverse reactions to any of the study formulations were encountered.

conclusionsTopical ciclosporin A 0.05% was not shown to be of any benefit over placebo as a steroid sparing agent in steroid dependent allergic eye disease.

Indexed as

AdultConjunctivitis, AllergicCyclosporineDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmic SolutionsProspective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeCyclosporineGlucocorticoidsImmunosuppressive AgentsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID16547328
PMCPMC1857014
OpenAlexW2030185059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.