ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006
How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?
Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Management of asymptomatic cardiac murmurs in term neonates.Pediatric cardiology · 2013Pooled it
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Physical Examination and Pulse Oximetry for Critical Congenital Cardiac Disease Screening in Newborns.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cardiovascular physical examination as a screening tool for congenital heart disease in newborns at a teaching hospital in Ghana.Ghana medical journal · 2023Article
- Implementation of Congenital Heart Diseases Screening at the Bihac Cantonal Hospital.Materia socio-medica · 2017Article
- Should pulse oximetry be used to screen for congenital heart disease?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2007Review
- How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006Review
- Clinical score to detect congenital heart defects: Concept of second screening.Annals of pediatric cardiologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsTo assess what proportion of all cardiac abnormality can be suspected at birth when all clinical examination before discharge is undertaken by a small stable team of clinicians.
methodsA prospective audit of all the 14 572 births in a maternity unit only staffed by nurse practitioners between 1996 and 2003.
results1.2% of all babies born in the unit were found to have a structural defect (as confirmed by echocardiography) within a year of birth. The number not suspected before discharge declined over time, and only 6% were first suspected after discharge in the last four years of this eight year study. Four potentially life threatening conditions initially went unsuspected in 1996-8, but none after that. A policy of referring every term baby with a murmur at 1 day of age that was still present at 7-10 days resulted in 4.2% requiring cardiac referral; 54% of these babies still had a murmur when assessed one to two weeks later, and 33% had a structural defect. Parents said in independent, retrospectively conducted, interviews that they found it confidence building to have any possible heart defect identified early and the cause of any murmur clearly and authoritatively explained.
conclusionsEffective screening requires experience and a clear, structured, referral pathway, but can work much better than most previous reports suggest. Whether staff bring a medical or nursing background to the task may well be of less importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.