Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16547080›Full record

ArticleArchives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition2006

How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?

C Patton, E Hey

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Should pulse oximetry be used to screen for congenital heart disease?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2007
    Review
  6. How effectively can clinical examination pick up congenital heart disease at birth?Archives of disease in childhood. Fetal and neonatal edition · 2006
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

C PattonMaternity Unit, Wansbeck General Hospital, Ashington, Northumberland NE63 9JJ, UK. Clare.Patton@northumbria-healthcare.nhs.uk
E Hey

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo assess what proportion of all cardiac abnormality can be suspected at birth when all clinical examination before discharge is undertaken by a small stable team of clinicians.

methodsA prospective audit of all the 14 572 births in a maternity unit only staffed by nurse practitioners between 1996 and 2003.

results1.2% of all babies born in the unit were found to have a structural defect (as confirmed by echocardiography) within a year of birth. The number not suspected before discharge declined over time, and only 6% were first suspected after discharge in the last four years of this eight year study. Four potentially life threatening conditions initially went unsuspected in 1996-8, but none after that. A policy of referring every term baby with a murmur at 1 day of age that was still present at 7-10 days resulted in 4.2% requiring cardiac referral; 54% of these babies still had a murmur when assessed one to two weeks later, and 33% had a structural defect. Parents said in independent, retrospectively conducted, interviews that they found it confidence building to have any possible heart defect identified early and the cause of any murmur clearly and authoritatively explained.

conclusionsEffective screening requires experience and a clear, structured, referral pathway, but can work much better than most previous reports suggest. Whether staff bring a medical or nursing background to the task may well be of less importance.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAttitude to HealthClinical Nursing ResearchEnglandFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart MurmursHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMothersNeonatal ScreeningNurse PractitionersNursing AuditPediatric Nursing

Identifiers

PMID16547080
PMCPMC2672726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.