Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16543519›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2006

Clinical and economic results of bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

V Fraix, J-L Houeto, C Lagrange, C Le Pen, P Krystkowiak, D Guehl, C Ardouin, M-L Welter, F Maurel, L Defebvre and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Pathways of translation: deep brain stimulation.Clinical and translational science · 2013
    Review
  18. Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2013
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

V FraixDepartment of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Grenoble University Hospital and INSERM U318 Joseph Fourier University, Grenoble Cedex 9, France.
J-L Houeto
C Lagrange
C Le Pen
P Krystkowiak
D Guehl
C Ardouin
M-L Welter
F Maurel
L Defebvre
A Rougier
A-L Benabid
V Mesnage
M Ligier
S Blond
P Burbaud
B Bioulac
A Destée
P Cornu
P Pollak
SPARK Study Group
Inserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an alternative but expensive neurosurgical treatment for parkinsonian patients with levodopa induced motor complications.

objectiveTo assess the safety, clinical effects, quality of life, and economic cost of STN stimulation.

methodsWe conducted a prospective multicentre study in 95 consecutive Parkinson's disease (PD) patients receiving bilateral STN stimulation and assessed its effects over 12 months. A double blind randomised motor evaluation was carried out at 3 month follow up, and quality of life, self care ability, and predictive factors of outcome following surgery were assessed. The cost of PD was estimated over 6 months before and after surgery.

resultsThe Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score improved by 57% (p<0.0001) and activities of daily living improved by 48% (p<0.0001) at 12 month follow up. Double blind motor scoring improved by 51% at 3 month follow up (p<0.0001). The total PD Quality of Life Questionnaire (PDQL-37) score improved by 28% (p<0.001). The better the preoperative motor score after a levodopa challenge, the better the outcome after STN stimulation. Five patients developed an intracerebral haematoma during electrode implantation with permanent after effects in two. The 6 month costs of PD decreased from 10,087 euros before surgery to 1673 euros after surgery (p<0.0001) mainly because of the decrease in medication. These savings allowed a return on the procedure investment, estimated at 36,904 euros over 2.2 years.

conclusionsSTN stimulation has good outcomes with relatively low risk and little cost burden in PD patients with levodopa induced motor complications.

Indexed as

Parkinson DiseaseActivities of Daily LivingAgedAntiparkinson AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisDeep Brain StimulationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFunctional LateralityHumansLevodopaMaleProspective StudiesQuality of LifeSubthalamic NucleusSurveys and QuestionnairesAntiparkinson AgentsLevodopa

Identifiers

PMID16543519
PMCPMC2077508
OpenAlexW2103265007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.