Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16542503›Full record

Trial reportBreast cancer research : BCR2006

Reduction in bone relapse and improved survival with oral clodronate for adjuvant treatment of operable breast cancer [ISRCTN83688026].

Trevor Powles, Alexander Paterson, Eugene McCloskey, Phil Schein, Bobbi Scheffler, Alwynne Tidy, Sue Ashley, Ian Smith, Lars Ottestad, John Kanis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 87 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
87citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

87 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 253 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. SEOM Clinical Guideline for bone metastases from solid tumours (2016).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2016
    Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. NCCN Task Force Report: Bone Health in Cancer Care.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2009
    Guideline
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. JNCI cancer spectrum · 2021
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

27 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Trevor PowlesParkside Oncology, London, UK. hdummer@parkside-hospital.co.uk
Alexander Paterson
Eugene McCloskey
Phil Schein
Bobbi Scheffler
Alwynne Tidy
Sue Ashley
Ian Smith
Lars Ottestad
John Kanis
Royal Marsden Hospital · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBNorwegian Cancer Society · NOParkside Hospital · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBVillanova University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionExperimental and clinical data show that the oral bisphosphonate clodronate (Bonefos) can inhibit tumor-induced osteoclastic bone resorption. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was designed to determine if the addition of oral clodronate to standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer could reduce the subsequent occurrence of bone metastases and thereby improve overall survival.

methods1,069 patients with primary operable stage I-III breast cancer were randomized to receive oral clodronate (1,600 mg/day) or placebo for 2 years, in conjunction with standard treatment for primary breast cancer including surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or tamoxifen. All patients were assessed for bone metastases at two and five years and additionally when clinically indicated. Survival status was determined as of the close of the study on 30 June 2000 with a median follow up of 5.6 years. The treatment arms were compared using the unstratified log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

resultsOral clodronate significantly reduced the risk of bone metastases in all patients over the 5 year study period (51 patients versus 73 patients with placebo; HR = 0.692, P = 0.043); the difference was also statistically significant over the 2 year medication period (19 patients versus 35 patients with placebo; HR = 0.546, P = 0.031). These differences were most pronounced in patients with stage II/III disease (39 patients versus 64 patients with placebo, HR = 0.592, P = 0.009 over 5 years; 16 patients versus 32 patients with placebo, HR= 0.496, P = 0.020 over 2 years). Survival data also favoured the clodronate arm (HR for all patients = 0.768, P = 0.048; HR for stage II/III disease = 0.743, P = 0.041), although this was not significant due to multiple analyses. Oral clodronate was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate diarrhoea being the most frequently reported adverse event.

conclusionThese results confirm that oral clodronate will significantly improve the 5 year bone relapse free survival when used as a supplementary adjuvant treatment for patients receiving standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone DiseasesBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantClodronic AcidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPlacebosRandom AllocationRecurrenceSurvival AnalysisBone Density Conservation AgentsClodronic AcidPlacebos

Identifiers

PMID16542503
PMCPMC1557723
OpenAlexW2125014991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.