Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16542428›Full record

ArticleSaline systems2006

Post-genomics of the model haloarchaeon Halobacterium sp. NRC-1.

Shiladitya DasSarma, Brian R Berquist, James A Coker, Priya DasSarma, Jochen A Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saline systems, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genes · 2021
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Acid Experimental Evolution of the HaloarchaeonFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Halophiles and their enzymes: negativity put to good use.Current opinion in microbiology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Adaptation of cells to new environments.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shiladitya DasSarmaUniversity of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Center of Marine Biotechnology, Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. dassarma@umbi.umd.edu
Brian R Berquist
James A Coker
Priya DasSarma
Jochen A Müller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Halobacteriumsp. NRC-1 is an extremely halophilic archaeon that is easily cultured and genetically tractable. Since its genome sequence was completed in 2000, a combination of genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and bioinformatic approaches have provided insights into both its extremophilic lifestyle as well as fundamental cellular processes common to all life forms. Here, we review post-genomic research on this archaeon, including investigations of DNA replication and repair systems, phototrophic, anaerobic, and other physiological capabilities, acidity of the proteome for function at high salinity, and role of lateral gene transfer in its evolution.

Identifiers

PMID16542428
PMCPMC1447603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.