Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16542417›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006

Genetic algorithm learning as a robust approach to RNA editing site prediction.

James Thompson, Shuba Gopal

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functions and regulation of the APOBEC family of proteins.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2012
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characteristics and prediction of RNA editing sites in transcripts of the Moss Takakia lepidozioides chloroplast.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2008
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

James ThompsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY 14623, USA. tex@u.washington.edu
Shuba Gopal
Rochester Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRNA editing is one of several post-transcriptional modifications that may contribute to organismal complexity in the face of limited gene complement in a genome. One form, known as C --> U editing, appears to exist in a wide range of organisms, but most instances of this form of RNA editing have been discovered serendipitously. With the large amount of genomic and transcriptomic data now available, a computational analysis could provide a more rapid means of identifying novel sites of C --> U RNA editing. Previous efforts have had some success but also some limitations. We present a computational method for identifying C --> U RNA editing sites in genomic sequences that is both robust and generalizable. We evaluate its potential use on the best data set available for these purposes: C --> U editing sites in plant mitochondrial genomes.

resultsOur method is derived from a machine learning approach known as a genetic algorithm. REGAL (RNA Editing site prediction by Genetic Algorithm Learning) is 87% accurate when tested on three mitochondrial genomes, with an overall sensitivity of 82% and an overall specificity of 91%. REGAL's performance significantly improves on other ab initio approaches to predicting RNA editing sites in this data set. REGAL has a comparable sensitivity and higher specificity than approaches which rely on sequence homology, and it has the advantage that strong sequence conservation is not required for reliable prediction of edit sites.

conclusionOur results suggest that ab initio methods can generate robust classifiers of putative edit sites, and we highlight the value of combinatorial approaches as embodied by genetic algorithms. We present REGAL as one approach with the potential to be generalized to other organisms exhibiting C --> U RNA editing.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsRNA EditingArabidopsisBinding SitesBrassica napusComputational BiologyDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantGenes, PlantGenome, PlantModels, GeneticOryzaPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRNARNA, MitochondrialDNA, MitochondrialDNA, PlantRNARNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID16542417
PMCPMC1459874
OpenAlexW1864046668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.