Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16538480›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2006

Predictors and markers of resistance to neurotropic nematode infection in rodent host.

Peeter Hõrak, Lea Tummeleht, Heli Talvik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peeter HõrakInstitute of Zoology and Hydrobiology, Tartu University, Vanemuise 46, Tartu, 51014, Estonia. horak@ut.ee
Lea Tummeleht
Heli Talvik
University of Tartu · EEEstonian University of Life Sciences · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasite-mediated selection is currently believed to play an important role in life-history evolution. To assess how simple hematoserological and biochemical condition indices reflect host immunocompetence and infection resistance controlled laboratory experiments are required. We addressed these issues by infecting laboratory rats with the standard dose of embryonated eggs of a neurotropic nematode Toxocara canis. Urine baseline corticosterone concentrations, measured 1 week before infection, predicted the number of nematode larvae later recovered from host brains. Thus, this noninvasive clinical marker appeared useful for assessment of potential infection resistance. Rats who had accumulated high number of larvae in their brains and muscle had large spleens and high peripheral eosinophil counts 17 days postinfection. This finding is consistent with the concept that induction of eosinophilic Th2 type humoral immune response benefits the parasite rather than host. Hence, excessive peripheral eosinophilia and spleen enlargement are not markers of efficient antiparasite response in larval toxocariasis.

Indexed as

Immunity, InnateAnimalsBiomarkersBrainCanidaeCorticosteroneDisease Models, AnimalEosinophilsLarvaLeukocyte CountLymphocytesMaleMusclesRatsRats, WistarRodentiaBiomarkersCorticosterone

Identifiers

PMID16538480
OpenAlexW2090873777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.