Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16537623›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2006

Replication properties of human adenovirus in vivo and in cultures of primary cells from different animal species.

Christian Jogler, Dennis Hoffmann, Dirk Theegarten, Thomas Grunwald, Klaus Uberla, Oliver Wildner

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 78 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
78citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

78 citing papers in PubMed, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Viral Eco-Genomic Tools: Development and Implementation for Aquatic Biomonitoring.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christian JoglerDepartment of Molecular and Medical Virology, Ruhr-University Bochum, D-44801 Bochum, Germany.
Dennis Hoffmann
Dirk Theegarten
Thomas Grunwald
Klaus Uberla
Oliver Wildner
Ruhr University Bochum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncolytic adenoviruses have emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of tumors resistant to other treatment modalities. However, preclinical safety studies are hampered by the lack of a permissive nonhuman host. Screening of a panel of primary cell cultures from seven different animal species revealed that porcine cells support productive replication of human adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) nearly as efficiently as human A549 cells, while release of infectious virus by cells from other animal species tested was diminished by several orders of magnitude. Restriction of productive Ad5 replication in rodent and rabbit cells seems to act primarily at a postentry step. Replication efficiency of adenoviral vectors harboring different E1 deletions or mutations in porcine cells was similar to that in A549 cells. Side-by-side comparison of the viral load kinetics in blood of swine and mice injected with Ad5 or a replication-deficient adenoviral vector failed to provide clear evidence for virus replication in mice. In contrast, evidence suggests that adenovirus replication occurs in swine, since adenoviral late gene expression produced a 13.5-fold increase in viral load in an individual swine from day 3 to day 7 and 100-fold increase in viral DNA levels in the Ad5-infected swine compared to the animal receiving a replication-deficient adenovirus. Lung histology of Ad5-infected swine revealed a severe interstitial pneumonia. Although the results in swine are based on a small number of animals and need to be confirmed, our data strongly suggest that infection of swine with human adenovirus or oncolytic adenoviral vectors is a more appropriate animal model to study adenoviral pathogenicity or pharmacodynamic and toxicity profiles of adenoviral vectors than infection of mice.

Indexed as

Virus ReplicationAdenoviruses, HumanAnimalsCell LineCricetinaeCytopathogenic Effect, ViralDNA, ViralFemaleFlow CytometryGenetic VectorsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsGuinea PigsHeLa CellsHumansInflammationInjections, IntravenousDNA, ViralGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID16537623
PMCPMC1440393
OpenAlexW2122669148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.