Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16537479›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Structures of eukaryotic ribonucleotide reductase I provide insights into dNTP regulation.

Hai Xu, Catherine Faber, Tomoaki Uchiki, James W Fairman, Joseph Racca, Chris Dealwis

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Hypermutability ofEmerging microbes & infections · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An endogenous dAMP ligand inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Potent competitive inhibition of human ribonucleotide reductase by a nonnucleoside small molecule.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hai XuDepartment of Biochemistry and Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee, M407 Walters Life Sciences, Knoxville, TN 37996-0840, USA.
Catherine Faber
Tomoaki Uchiki
James W Fairman
Joseph Racca
Chris Dealwis
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

Structure-Function and Inhibition of Rnr1R01CA100827 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI DEALWIS, CHRIS G · 2003 to 2011
$2.5M
Parental Role in Pediatric Cancer Pain and SurvivorshipR01CA100027 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALBRECHT, TERRANCE L. · 2003 to 2005
$866k
NCI NIH HHS 2 R01 CA1000827-03NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100027NCI NIH HHS R01 CA100827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ribonucleotide reductase catalyzes a crucial step in de novo DNA synthesis and is allosterically controlled by relative levels of dNTPs to maintain a balanced pool of deoxynucleoside triphosphates in the cell. In eukaryotes, the enzyme comprises a heterooligomer of alpha(2) and beta(2) subunits. The alpha subunit, Rnr1, contains catalytic and regulatory sites. Here, we report the only x-ray structures of the eukaryotic alpha subunit of ribonucleotide reductase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The structures of the apo-, AMPPNP only-, AMPPNP-CDP-, AMPPNP-UDP-, dGTP-ADP- and TTP-GDP-bound complexes give insight into substrate and effector binding and specificity cross-talk. These are Class I structures with the only fully ordered catalytic sites, including loop 2, a stretch of polypeptide that spans specificity and catalytic sites, conferring specificity. Binding of specificity effector rearranges loop 2; in our structures, this rearrangement moves P294, a residue unique to eukaryotes, out of the catalytic site, accommodating substrate binding. Substrate binding further rearranges loop 2. Cross-talk, by which effector binding regulates substrate preference, occurs largely through R293 and Q288 of loop 2, which are analogous to residues in Thermotoga maritima that mediate cross-talk. However loop-2 conformations and residue-substrate interactions differ substantially between yeast and T. maritima. In most effector-substrate complexes, water molecules help mediate substrate-loop 2 interactions. Finally, the substrate ribose binds with its 3' hydroxyl closer than its 2' hydroxyl to C218 of the catalytic redox pair. We also see a conserved water molecule at the catalytic site in all our structures, near the ribose 2' hydroxyl.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainCrystallography, X-RayDeoxyribonucleotidesModels, MolecularProtein Structure, TertiaryRecombinant ProteinsRibonucleotide ReductasesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSubstrate SpecificityThermotoga maritimaDeoxyribonucleotidesRecombinant ProteinsRibonucleotide Reductases

Identifiers

PMID16537479
PMCPMC1389704
OpenAlexW1965095392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.