Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16537354›Full record

ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2006

Mortality after acute myocardial infarction according to income and education.

Jeppe N Rasmussen, Søren Rasmussen, Gunnar H Gislason, Pernille Buch, Steen Z Abildstrom, Lars Køber, Merete Osler, Finn Diderichsen, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Mette Madsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ACCF/AHA/ACP 2009 competence and training statement: a curriculum on prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association/American College of Physicians Task Force on Competence and Training (Writing Committee to Develop a Competence and Training Statement on Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease): developed in collaboration with the American Academy of Neurology; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; American College of Preventive Medicine; American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association; American Society of Hypertension; Association of Black Cardiologists; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Lipid Association; and Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2009
    Guideline
  2. Income and recurrent events after a coronary event in women.European journal of epidemiology · 2008
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Myocardial infarction care in low and high socioeconomic environments: claims data analysis.Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeppe N RasmussenNational Institute of Public Health, Øster Farimagsgade 5, DK-1399 Copenhagen K, Denmark. jnr@niph.dk
Søren Rasmussen
Gunnar H Gislason
Pernille Buch
Steen Z Abildstrom
Lars Køber
Merete Osler
Finn Diderichsen
Christian Torp-Pedersen
Mette Madsen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo study how income and educational level influence mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). DESIGN AND

settingProspective analysis using individual level linkage of registries in Denmark.

participantsAll patients 30-74 years old hospitalised for the first time with AMI in Denmark in 1995-2002.

main outcome measuresRelative risk (RR) of 30 day mortality and long term mortality (31 days until 31 December 2003) associated with income (adjusted for education) or educational level (adjusted for income) and further adjusted for sex, age, civil status, and comorbidity.

resultsThe study identified 21 391 patients 30-64 years old and 16 169 patients 65-74 years old. The 30 day mortality was 7.0% among patients 30-64 years old and 15.9% among those 65-74 years old. Among patients surviving the first 30 days, the long term mortality was 9.9% and 28.3%, respectively. The adjusted RR of 30 day mortality and long term mortality among younger patients with low compared with high income was 1.54 (95% confidence interval 1.36 to 1.79) and 1.65 (1.45 to 1.85), respectively. The RR of 30 day and long term mortality among younger patients with low compared with high education was 1.24 (1.03 to 1.50) and 1.33 (1.11 to 1.59), respectively. The RR of 30 day and long term mortality among older patients with low compared with high income was 1.27 (1.15 to 1.41) and 1.38 (1.27 to 1.50), respectively. Older high and low education patients did not differ in mortality.

conclusionThis study shows that both educational level and income substantially and independently affect mortality after AMI, indicating that each indicator has specific effects on mortality and that these indicators are not interchangeable.

Indexed as

Educational StatusIncomeAcute DiseaseAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleHospital MortalityHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionProportional Hazards ModelsProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID16537354
PMCPMC2566173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.