ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006
Genetic epidemiology and primary care.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating ethnicity into genetic risk assessment for Alzheimer disease: the REVEAL study experience.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2008Trial
- Community engagement about genetic variation research.Population health management · 2012Article
- Academic health sciences centres: an opportunity to improve services, teaching, and research.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010Article
- Generation Scotland: the Scottish Family Health Study; a new resource for researching genes and heritability.BMC medical genetics · 2006Article
- Genetic epidemiology and primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
- Genetics, Big Brother and the GP.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large-scale, population-based studies of genetic epidemiology are under way or planned in several countries, including the UK. The results will have many implications for GPs and their patients. Primary care has much to contribute to this research, and basing genetic epidemiology studies in primary care will confer several advantages. These include enhanced public engagement, building on the personal relationships and trust that are at the core of primary care practice; methodological factors that will strengthen study design; and the potential of linkage of multiple datasets and between networks of research practices. Essential development work with primary care professionals and the public is, however, required for this to happen, and, if undertaken, this work will have the additional important benefit of increasing the uptake of new knowledge into general practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16536962PMC1828265What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.