ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006
Discovering the research priorities of people with diabetes in a multicultural community: a focus group study.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hypertension Prevalence, Health Service Utilization, and Participant Satisfaction: Findings From a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial in Aged Chinese Canadians.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing · 2017Trial
- Features of Mobile Health Apps for Tobacco Cessation That Appeal to Black Adults Who Use Tobacco Products: Focus Group Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Message development for a communication campaign to support health warning labels on cigars: a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Diabetes Research Matters: A Three-Round Priority-Setting Survey Consultation with Adults Living with Diabetes and Family Members in Australia.The patient · 2024Article
- Identifying the Health Concerns of Pregnant British Pakistani Women Living in Deprived Areas: A Qualitative Study.Maternal and child health journal · 2024Article
- Diabetes-related research priorities of people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Germany.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Exploring the obesity concerns of British Pakistani women living in deprived inner-city areas: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Experience of living near a highway in Nepal: Community perceptions of road dangers in Makwanpur district.Journal of transport & health · 2022Article
- Methods to Generate Innovative Research Ideas and Improve Patient and Public Involvement in Modern Epidemiological Research: Review, Patient Viewpoint, and Guidelines for Implementation of a Digital Cohort Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Review
- Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a focus group study.Archives of osteoporosis · 2020Article
- Evaluating the "return on patient engagement initiatives" in medicines research and development: A literature review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Review
- How patient and community involvement in diabetes research influences health outcomes: A realist review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2019Review
- Using the Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework to assess the impact of public involvement in a mental health research context: A reflective case study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Article
- Setting the top 10 research priorities to improve the health of people with Type 2 diabetes: a Diabetes UK-James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2018Article
- Patient engagement in type 2 diabetes mellitus research: what patients want.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Public priorities for osteoporosis and fracture research: results from a general population survey.Archives of osteoporosis · 2017Article
- Does funded research reflect the priorities of people living with type 1 diabetes? A secondary analysis of research questions.BMJ open · 2017Article
- An Innovative Approach to Informing Research: Gathering Perspectives on Diabetes Care Challenges From an Online Patient Community.Interactive journal of medical research · 2015Article
- Prioritizing research needs based on a systematic evidence review: a pilot process for engaging stakeholders.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2013Article
- Public priorities for joint pain research: results from a general population survey.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsually experts decide on which research is worthwhile, yet it is government policy to involve service users in research. There has been a lack of published research about involving patients from minority ethnic groups and people from deprived areas in setting research agendas. In this study we wanted to hear the voices of patients that are not often heard.
aimTo find out the research priorities of people with diabetes from an inner city community and compare these with current expert-led research priorities in diabetes. DESIGN OF STUDY: A qualitative study using a participatory approach with consumer groups.
settingPrimary care within inner city Nottingham, UK.
methodThirty-nine adult patients with diabetes with varying ethnic backgrounds recruited from three general practices. Six focus groups carried out in participants' preferred language, analysed using the constant comparative method.
resultsNine main themes equating to research priorities were identified. Within these themes, information and awareness, service delivery and primary prevention of diabetes emerged as the main factors. There were no science-based topics and there was more emphasis on culturally influenced research questions, which differed from recent Department of Health priorities. There were several themes about service delivery, patient self-management and screening and prevention of diabetes that overlapped.
conclusionsThere is some divergence between expert-led and patient-led agendas in research about diabetes. Patient perspectives have a significant influence on research priorities, and there are likely to be several different patient perspectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16536961PMC1828264What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.