Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16536957›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2006

Longer term outcomes from a randomised trial of prescribing strategies in otitis media.

Paul Little, Michael Moore, Greg Warner, Joan Dunleavy, Ian Williamson

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effectiveness of safety-netting approaches for acutely ill children: a network meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Delayed antibiotic prescriptions for respiratory infections.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Antibiotics for acute otitis media in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Otitis media in children (acute).BMJ clinical evidence · 2007
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Prescribing antibiotics to patients with acute cough and otitis media.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2006
    Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paul LittleCommunity Clinical Sciences (Primary Medical Care Group), University of Southampton, Aldermoor Health Centre, Southampton. p.little@soton.ac.uk
Michael Moore
Greg Warner
Joan Dunleavy
Ian Williamson
University of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are limited data about the longer-term outcomes in acute otitis media (AOM) when comparing the realistic alternatives of immediate prescription of antibiotics and a 'wait and see' or delayed prescribing policy.

aimThe aim was to assess the medium and longer term outcomes of two prescribing strategies for otitis media. DESIGN OF STUDY: Follow-up of a randomised controlled trial cohort.

settingPrimary care.

methodThree-hundred and fifteen children aged 6 months to 10 years presenting with AOM were randomised to immediate antibiotics, or antibiotics delayed at the parents discretion 72 hours if the child still had significant otalgia or fever, or was not improving. Episodes of earache since study entry were documented, and a poor score (of 9 or more--the top 20%) on a reliable six-item functional rating scale (Cronbach's alpha = 0.75).

resultsThe delayed prescribing strategy did not significantly increase reported episodes of earache in the 3 months since randomisation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.48 to 1.65) or over 1 year (OR = 1.03; 95% CI = 0.60 to 1.78) nor of poor scores on the function scale at 3 months (OR = 1.16; 95% CI = 0.61 to 2.22) or 1 year (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 0.57 to 2.19), and controlling for subsequent antibiotic use after the randomised episode did not alter these estimates. The number of prior episodes of AOM documented in the doctor's notes predicted episodes of earache reported (0, 1, > or = 2 episodes, respectively; OR = 1, 2.42, 2.61; chi2 for trend 8.04; P<0.01). There was weaker evidence that prior episodes also predicted poor function at 1 year (OR = 1, 1.86, 2.28; chi2 for trend 5.49; P = 0.019). For children with recurrent AOM (two or more previous episodes documented in the doctor's notes, n = 43) there was possible evidence of fewer episodes of earache in the 3 months since study entry in the immediate antibiotic group (10% compared to 39% in the delayed group, chi2 4.8, P = 0.029), but no effect from randomisation to 1 year.

conclusionsFor most children, delayed prescribing is not likely to have adverse longer-term consequences. Children with recurrent AOM are more likely to have poorer outcomes. Secondary analysis should be treated with caution and requires confirmation, but suggests that treating such children with antibiotics immediately may not alter longer-term outcomes.

Indexed as

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolErythromycinFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantOtitis MediaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsErythromycin

Identifiers

PMID16536957
PMCPMC1828260
OpenAlexW1921197216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.