Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16536634›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2006

Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management.

Kalyana C Nandipati, Rupesh Raina, Ashok Agarwal, Craig D Zippe

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Penile rehabilitation following treatment for prostate cancer: an analysis of the current state of the art.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2009
    Article
  10. Should penile rehabilitation become the norm following radical prostatectomy?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2009
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kalyana C NandipatiGlickman Urological Institute and Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Rupesh Raina
Ashok Agarwal
Craig D Zippe
Cleveland Clinic · USCase Western Reserve University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radical prostatectomy has been the time-honoured and standard treatment option for prostate cancer. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the common quality-of-life issues following radical prostatectomy. The recovery of potency following radical prostatectomy varies from 16% to 86%. Although major modifications in surgical technique appear to be promising, the reported ED rates are still high. The time period required for the recovery of erectile function after surgery varies from 6 to 24 months. During this period of neuropraxia lack of natural erections produces cavernosal hypoxia. This cavernosal hypoxia has been implicated as one of the most important factors in the pathophysiology of ED. Cavernosal hypoxia predisposes to cavernosal fibrosis, ultimately producing venous leak and long-term ED. Interruption of this cascade of events has been the major challenge for physicians. Physicians have several options available for the treatment of ED. However, oral treatment options have quickly become established as first-line treatment options. Sildenafil has been most extensively studied in the radical prostatectomy population. In patients who do not respond to oral therapy alone, standard treatment options (intracavernosal injections, vacuum constriction devices and intraurethral alprostadil) are useful. Use of penile prostheses is one of the oldest treatment options available for the treatment of ED but is used only as a last resort. Initial attempts to promote the earlier recovery of erectile function appear to be promising. However, further confirmatory studies are essential. The roles of gene transfer and growth factors are still in experimental stages. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment options available for ED following radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAgedAlgorithmsAlprostadilCarbolinesCombined Modality TherapyDrug Therapy, CombinationErectile DysfunctionHumansImidazolesMaleMiddle AgedPenile ProsthesisPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPiperazinesPractice Guidelines as TopicAlprostadilCarbolinesImidazolesPhosphodiesterase InhibitorsPiperazinesPurinesSildenafil CitrateSulfonesTadalafilTriazinesVardenafil DihydrochlorideVasodilator Agents

Identifiers

PMID16536634
OpenAlexW2136502030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.