ReviewDrugs & aging2006
Erectile dysfunction following radical retropubic prostatectomy: epidemiology, pathophysiology and pharmacological management.
Review in Drugs & aging, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- A multicenter, randomized, open-labeled, parallel group trial of sildenafil in alcohol-associated erectile dysfunction: the impact on psychosocial outcomes.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2009Trial
- Article
- Erectile dysfunction associated with prostate cancer treatment and therapeutic advances: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Erectile Dysfunction in Radical Prostatectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating a Non-Invasive Addition to Penile Rehabilitation.Sexual medicine · 2020Article
- The Prostate Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic: a biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2018Article
- Development of UK recommendations on treatment for post-surgical erectile dysfunction.International journal of clinical practice · 2014Article
- Avanafil: a review of its use in patients with erectile dysfunction.Drugs & aging · 2013Review
- Review
- Penile rehabilitation following treatment for prostate cancer: an analysis of the current state of the art.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2009Article
- Should penile rehabilitation become the norm following radical prostatectomy?Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2009Article
- Vacuum erection devices to treat erectile dysfunction and early penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy.Current urology reports · 2008Article
- [Corpus cavernosum rehabilitation after radical urooncological procedures].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2008Review
- Modified technique for neurovascular bundle preservation during radical prostatectomy: association between technique and recovery of erectile function.BJU international · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy has been the time-honoured and standard treatment option for prostate cancer. Erectile dysfunction (ED) is one of the common quality-of-life issues following radical prostatectomy. The recovery of potency following radical prostatectomy varies from 16% to 86%. Although major modifications in surgical technique appear to be promising, the reported ED rates are still high. The time period required for the recovery of erectile function after surgery varies from 6 to 24 months. During this period of neuropraxia lack of natural erections produces cavernosal hypoxia. This cavernosal hypoxia has been implicated as one of the most important factors in the pathophysiology of ED. Cavernosal hypoxia predisposes to cavernosal fibrosis, ultimately producing venous leak and long-term ED. Interruption of this cascade of events has been the major challenge for physicians. Physicians have several options available for the treatment of ED. However, oral treatment options have quickly become established as first-line treatment options. Sildenafil has been most extensively studied in the radical prostatectomy population. In patients who do not respond to oral therapy alone, standard treatment options (intracavernosal injections, vacuum constriction devices and intraurethral alprostadil) are useful. Use of penile prostheses is one of the oldest treatment options available for the treatment of ED but is used only as a last resort. Initial attempts to promote the earlier recovery of erectile function appear to be promising. However, further confirmatory studies are essential. The roles of gene transfer and growth factors are still in experimental stages. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment options available for ED following radical prostatectomy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.