Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16533954›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical pathology2006

Sedimentation characteristics of leucocytes can predict bacteraemia in critical care patients.

L Bogar, Z Molnar, P Kenyeres, P Tarsoly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

L BogarDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pecs, Hungary. bogar@clinics.pote.hu
Z Molnar
P Kenyeres
P Tarsoly

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of blood stream infection can be lifesaving, but the results of blood cultures are not usually available before 24 hours after blood sampling. An earlier indication would lead to the initiation of immediate and adequate antibiotic treatment with obvious advantages for the patient.

objectiveTo evaluate the ability of leucocyte count, serum procalcitonin (PCT) concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and leucocyte antisedimentation rate (LAR) in predicting the blood culture results in critical care patients.

methods39 consecutive patients with their first febrile episode were investigated prospectively. LAR was determined as the percentage of leucocytes crossing the midline of a blood column upward during one hour of gravity sedimentation. The relevance of the different variables was estimated by likelihood ratio tests and area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC).

results23 patients had positive blood culture results and 16 negative. LAR was significantly higher in bacteraemic patients than in non-bacteraemic patients (p = 0.001), but leucocyte count, ESR and PCT level failed to show significant differences. Leucocyte count, PCT, and ESR yielded low discriminative values with the AUCs of 0.66, 0.64, and 0.52, respectively. LAR provided a likelihood ratio of 3.6 and an AUC of 0.80 (95% confidence interval, 0.64 to 0.95) (p = 0.002).

conclusionsThe simple LAR test can predict blood culture results and support urgent treatment decisions in critical care patients in their first febrile episode.

Indexed as

Critical CareAdultAgedArea Under CurveBacteremiaBlood SedimentationCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideCell MovementFemaleFeverHumansLeukocyte CountLeukocytesMaleMiddle AgedCALCA protein, humanCalcitoninCalcitonin Gene-Related PeptideProtein Precursors

Identifiers

PMID16533954
PMCPMC1860278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.