Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16533910›Full record

ArticleGenome research2006

Ancient duplicated conserved noncoding elements in vertebrates: a genomic and functional analysis.

Gayle K McEwen, Adam Woolfe, Debbie Goode, Tanya Vavouri, Heather Callaway, Greg Elgar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of the LF-SINE-Derived DistalJournal of pediatric genetics · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The mystery of extreme non-coding conservation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gayle K McEwenSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary, University of London, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Adam Woolfe
Debbie Goode
Tanya Vavouri
Heather Callaway
Greg Elgar
Queen Mary University of London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0401138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fish-mammal genomic comparisons have proved powerful in identifying conserved noncoding elements likely to be cis-regulatory in nature, and the majority of those tested in vivo have been shown to act as tissue-specific enhancers associated with genes involved in transcriptional regulation of development. Although most of these elements share little sequence identity to each other, a small number are remarkably similar and appear to be the product of duplication events. Here, we searched for duplicated conserved noncoding elements in the human genome, using comparisons with Fugu to select putative cis-regulatory sequences. We identified 124 families of duplicated elements, each containing between two and five members, that are highly conserved within and between vertebrate genomes. In 74% of cases, we were able to assign a specific set of paralogous genes with annotation relating to transcriptional regulation and/or development to each family, thus removing much of the ambiguity in identifying associated genes. We find that duplicate elements have the potential to up-regulate reporter gene expression in a tissue-specific manner and that expression domains often overlap, but are not necessarily identical, between family members. Over two thirds of the families are conserved in duplicate in fish and appear to predate the large-scale duplication events thought to have occurred at the origin of vertebrates. We propose a model whereby gene duplication and the evolution of cis-regulatory elements can be considered in the context of increased morphological diversity and the emergence of the modern vertebrate body plan.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGene DuplicationAnimalsBody PatterningGene Expression RegulationGenome, HumanHumansRegulatory Elements, TranscriptionalSequence Analysis, DNATakifugu

Identifiers

PMID16533910
PMCPMC1457030
OpenAlexW2125539728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.