Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16533845›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

A molecular dynamics study of the effect of Ca2+ removal on calmodulin structure.

Elad Project, Ran Friedman, Esther Nachliel, Menachem Gutman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Origin and prediction of free-solution interaction studies performed label-free.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elad ProjectLaser Laboratory for Fast Reactions in Biology Biochemistry, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ran Friedman
Esther Nachliel
Menachem Gutman
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calmodulin is a small (148 residues), ubiquitous, highly-conserved Ca(2+) binding protein serving as a modulator of many calcium-dependent processes. In this study, we followed, by means of molecular dynamics, the structural stability of the protein when one of its four bound Ca(2+) ions is removed, and compared it to a simulation of the fully Ca(2+) bound protein. We found that the removal of a single Ca(2+) ion from the N-lobe of the protein, which has a lower affinity for the ion, is sufficient to initiate a considerable structural rearrangement. Although the overall structure of the fully 4 Ca(2+) bound protein remained intact in the extended conformation, the Ca(2+)-removed protein changed its conformation into a compact state. The observation that the 3 Ca(2+) loaded protein assumes a compacted solution state is in accord with experimental observation that the NSCP protein, which binds only three Ca(2+) ions, is natively in a compact state. Examination of the folding dynamics reveals a cooperation between the C-lobe, N-lobe, and the interdomain helix that enable the conformation change. The forces driving this conformational change are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularProtein FoldingAnimalsCalciumCalmodulinCations, DivalentComputer SimulationHumansProtein ConformationCalciumCalmodulinCations, Divalent

Identifiers

PMID16533845
PMCPMC1459500
OpenAlexW1989680282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.