ArticleThe Biochemical journal2006
Evaluation of the membrane-spanning domain of ClC-2.
Article in The Biochemical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Novel Loss-of-Function Variant in the Chloride Ion Channel Gene Clcn2 Associates with Atrial Fibrillation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- A tale of two CLCs: biophysical insights toward understanding ClC-5 and ClC-7 function in endosomes and lysosomes.The Journal of physiology · 2015Review
- Direct interactions between ENaC gamma subunit and ClCN2 in cystic fibrosis epithelial cells.Physiological reports · 2015Article
- Permeant anions contribute to voltage dependence of ClC-2 chloride channel by interacting with the protopore gate.The Journal of physiology · 2010Article
- Chloride channels: often enigmatic, rarely predictable.Annual review of physiology · 2010Review
- Gating of human ClC-2 chloride channels and regulation by carboxy-terminal domains.The Journal of physiology · 2008Article
- ClC-2 regulation of intestinal barrier function: Translation of basic science to therapeutic target.Tissue barriersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ClC family of chloride channels and transporters includes several members in which mutations have been associated with human disease. An understanding of the structure-function relationships of these proteins is essential for defining the molecular mechanisms underlying pathogenesis. To date, the X-ray crystal structures of prokaryotic ClC transporter proteins have been used to model the membrane domains of eukaryotic ClC channel-forming proteins. Clearly, the fidelity of these models must be evaluated empirically. In the present study, biochemical tools were used to define the membrane domain boundaries of the eukaryotic protein, ClC-2, a chloride channel mutated in cases of idiopathic epilepsy. The membrane domain boundaries of purified ClC-2 and accessible cysteine residues were determined after its functional reconstitution into proteoliposomes, labelling using a thiol reagent and proteolytic digestion. Subsequently, the lipid-embedded and soluble fragments generated by trypsin-mediated proteolysis were studied by MS and coverage of approx. 71% of the full-length protein was determined. Analysis of these results revealed that the membrane-delimited boundaries of the N- and C-termini of ClC-2 and the position of several extramembrane loops determined by these methods are largely similar to those predicted on the basis of the prokaryotic protein [ecClC (Escherichia coli ClC)] structures. These studies provide direct biochemical evidence supporting the relevance of the prokaryotic ClC protein structures towards understanding the structure of mammalian ClC channel-forming proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.