Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16525897›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2006

The relationship of nondirectiveness to genetic counseling: report of a workshop at the 2003 NSGC Annual Education Conference.

Jon Weil, Kelly Ormond, June Peters, Kathryn Peters, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Bonnie LeRoy

Abstract readConference Proceedings
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetics and ethics.Journal of community genetics · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. 'And then you can decide'--antenatal foetal diagnosis decision making in South Africa.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2015
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. From genetic counseling to "genomic counseling".Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2013
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jon WeilDepartment of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, USA. weilj@berkeley.edu
Kelly Ormond
June Peters
Kathryn Peters
Barbara Bowles Biesecker
Bonnie LeRoy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nondirectiveness has been a guiding principle for genetic counseling since the founding of the profession. However, its efficacy and appropriateness in this role have been frequently questioned. A workshop at the 2003 Annual Education Conference of the National Society of Genetic Counselors provided audience participation in a discussion of these issues. Participants presented arguments for and against nondirectiveness as a central ethos. They described complex personal transitions in adapting what they had learned about nondirectiveness during training to the realities of the workplace. There was support for flexible approaches to genetic counseling, with varying adherence to nondirectiveness, based on client and family needs and values, clinical circumstances, and desired counseling outcomes. The discussion supports the use of clinical experience, outcomes research, and the experience of other professions to move beyond nondirectiveness and more accurately identify the theoretical bases that underlie genetic counseling in the variety of circumstances in which it is currently practiced.

Indexed as

EducationProfessional-Patient RelationsGenetic CounselingHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.