ArticleJournal of biomolecular techniques : JBT2005
Hematopoietic chimerism monitoring based on STRs: quantitative platform performance on sequential samples.
Article in Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- A phase 2 trial of GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy, sirolimus, and MMF after peripheral blood haploidentical transplantation.Blood advances · 2021Trial
- Off-the-shelf EBV-specific T cell immunotherapy for rituximab-refractory EBV-associated lymphoma following transplantation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2020Trial
- Atypical short tandem repeat allelic patterns in a sexual assault case involving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
- Chimerism Testing by Next Generation Sequencing for Detection of Engraftment and Early Disease Relapse in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation and an Overview of NGS Chimerism Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Comparison of the effect of DLI according to cell sources in relapsed AML after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.Annals of hematology · 2023Article
- Intra-arterial transplantation of HLA-matched donor mesoangioblasts in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.EMBO molecular medicine · 2015Article
- Lineage-specific chimerism analysis in nucleated cells, T cells and natural killer cells after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.The Korean journal of hematology · 2011Article
- Quantitative monitoring of multi-donor chimerism: a systematic, validated framework for routine analysis.Bone marrow transplantation · 2010Article
- Article
- Assessing quantitative chimerism longitudinally: technical considerations, clinical applications and routine feasibility.Bone marrow transplantation · 2007Review
- Reliability of quantitative chimerism results: assessment of sample performance using novel parameters.Leukemia · 2006Article
- Quantification of mixed chimerism allows early therapeutic interventions.Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) creates a donor-recipient cellular chimerism in the patient, which is quantitatively assayed from peripheral blood based on STR-DNA. Since chimerism values often vary across a patient's samples, it is important to determine to what extent this variability reflects technical aspects of platform performance. This issue is systematically assessed in the current study for the first time. Using the SGM Plus multiplex PCR kit and ABI platform, the longitudinal performance of STR markers was quantitatively evaluated in two chimeric models with true values, and in patient samples (n >500 marker loci). Computation of percent chimerism for each marker, and mean (sample) percent chimerism, standard deviation, and coefficient of variance was performed by our ChimerTrack utility. In chimeric models with known values, individual markers exhibited an accuracy (observed/true) of 88-98%; replication precision was 92-100% true, with a mean error of 2%. Fragment size calling was greater than 99% accurate and precise. Patient results were comparable for markers, relaive to sample means. One source of technical variability in chimerism estimation was allelic differential amplification efficiency. The latter was influenced by signal amplitude, dye label, marker size, and allelic size interval. It can be concluded that long-term chimeric tracking is routinely feasible using this platform in conjunction with ChimerTrack software. Importantly, mean percent chimerism, for any sample, should closely approximate the true chimeric status, with a technical accuracy of 98%. Guidelines are presented for selecting an optimized marker profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16522860PMC2291760W140220451What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.