Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16522812›Full record

ReviewBlood2006

Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results.

Timothy Hughes, Michael Deininger, Andreas Hochhaus, Susan Branford, Jerald Radich, Jaspal Kaeda, Michele Baccarani, Jorge Cortes, Nicholas C P Cross, Brian J Druker and 11 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 409 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
409citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

409 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Final 5-Year Study Results of DASISION: The Dasatinib Versus Imatinib Study in Treatment-Naïve Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2016
    Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

349 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Timothy HughesInstitute of Medical and Veterinary Science, Adelaide, Australia.
Michael Deininger
Andreas Hochhaus
Susan Branford
Jerald Radich
Jaspal Kaeda
Michele Baccarani
Jorge Cortes
Nicholas C P Cross
Brian J Druker
Jean Gabert
David Grimwade
Rüdiger Hehlmann
Suzanne Kamel-Reid
Jeffrey H Lipton
Janina Longtine
Giovanni Martinelli
Giuseppe Saglio
Simona Soverini
Wendy Stock
John M Goldman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction in 1998 of imatinib mesylate (IM) revolutionized management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the second generation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors may prove superior to IM. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) provides an accurate measure of the total leukemiacell mass and the degree to which BCR-ABL transcripts are reduced by therapy correlates with progression-free survival. Because a rising level of BCR-ABL is an early indication of loss of response and thus the need to reassess therapeutic strategy, regular molecular monitoring of individual patients is clearly desirable. Here we summarize the results of a consensus meeting that took place at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in Bethesda in October 2005. We make suggestions for (1) harmonizing the differing methodologies for measuring BCR-ABL transcripts in patients with CML undergoing treatment and using a conversion factor whereby individual laboratories can express BCR-ABL transcript levels on an internationally agreed scale; (2) using serial RQ-PCR results rather than bone marrow cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for the BCR-ABL gene to monitor individual patients responding to treatment; and (3) detecting and reporting Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive subpopulations bearing BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations. We recognize that our recommendations are provisional and will require revision as new evidence emerges.

Indexed as

MutationDrug MonitoringFusion Proteins, bcr-ablHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein Structure, TertiaryProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityFusion Proteins, bcr-ablProtein Kinase InhibitorsProtein-Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID16522812
PMCPMC1895821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.