Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16522256›Full record

ReviewCurrent HIV/AIDS reports2006

Understanding the "lucky few": the conundrum of HIV-exposed, seronegative individuals.

Barbara L Shacklett

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current HIV/AIDS reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HIV-1-specific CD8PNAS nexus · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Can T Cells Abort SARS-CoV-2 and Other Viral Infections?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. CD8Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mucosal immunology of HIV infection.Immunological reviews · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Mucosal immunity to HIV: a review of recent literature.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2008
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Barbara L ShacklettDepartment of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, 1 Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA. blshacklett@ucdavis.edu

Funding

HIV-SPECIFIC CTL IN EXPOSED, UNINFECTED INDIVIDUALSR21AI047746 · NIAID · J. DAVID GLADSTONE INSTITUTES · PI SHACKLETT, BARBARA L · 2000 to 2001
$532k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has been known for many years that not all individuals who are repeatedly exposed to HIV-1 show evidence of viral replication, seroconvert, and eventually develop disease. Quite apart from those who seroconvert but progress slowly to AIDS (ie, slow progressors, long-term nonprogressors, elite controllers), these rare, exposed seronegatives either resist infection or harbor extremely low levels of virus that may be detected only using ultrasensitive methods (occult infection). The correlates of protection that confer this unique status to a tiny minority of HIV-exposed individuals remain a subject of intense interest, investigation, and controversy, as no single genetic or immunologic parameter has yet been able to fully explain this phenomenon. However, there is general consensus that studying these individuals may provide invaluable information to aid in the design of vaccines and therapeutic approaches. This review describes the major findings on this important topic, with a focus on immunologic studies.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesChemokinesHIV InfectionsHIV SeronegativityHumansImmunity, InnateKiller Cells, NaturalSuppressor Factors, ImmunologicT-Lymphocytes, CytotoxicT-Lymphocytes, Helper-InducerAutoantibodiesChemokinesSuppressor Factors, Immunologic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.