ArticlePostgraduate medical journal2006
Long term clinical outcome and bleeding complications among hospital survivors with acute coronary syndromes.
Article in Postgraduate medical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the 21 month clinical outcome and bleeding complications in hospital survivors with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTEACS) who were discharged with combined clopidogrel and aspirin anti-thrombotic therapy, and compare with those having ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who were discharged with aspirin alone.
designObservational study.
settingA large university hospital. PATIENTS: 224 patients were admitted to hospital with either NSTEACS or STEMI, and survived to discharge between 1 October 2001 and 31 December 2002.
main outcome measuresCardiovascular death, total death, new myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalisation, stroke or transient ischaemic attack, coronary revascularisation; and fatal, life threatening, major and minor bleeding over 21 months after discharge.
resultsDespite having no or small infarct (median maximum creatine kinase 155 v 1295 u/l; p<0.001) and taking more antianginal drugs, patients with NSTEACS had similar rates of cardiovascular death (9.5% v 8.3%; p = NS), new myocardial infarction (9.5% v 6.5%; p = NS) or unstable angina requiring hospitalisation (15.5% v 10.2%; p = NS) when compared with STEMI. Fatal, life threatening or major bleeding were <1% in both groups (p = NS); and minor bleeding occurred in 4.3% NSTEACS and 2.8% STEMI patients respectively (p = NS).
conclusionsPatients with NSTEACS had a similar and unfavourable long term outcome when compared with STEMI. There was no difference in serious bleeding complications between both groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.