Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16513738›Full record

ArticleJournal of bacteriology2006

Common and variable contributions of Fis residues to high-affinity binding at different DNA sequences.

Leah S Feldman-Cohen, Yongping Shao, Derrick Meinhold, Charmi Miller, Wilfredo Colón, Robert Osuna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bacteriology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-wide promoter assembly inGenome research · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Crystal structure of the nucleoid-associated protein Fis (PA4853) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Leah S Feldman-CohenDepartment of Chemistry, College of Staten Island and Macromolecular Assemblies Institute of the City, University of New York, Staten Island 10314, USA.
Yongping Shao
Derrick Meinhold
Charmi Miller
Wilfredo Colón
Robert Osuna

Funding

REGULATION AND FUNCTION OF FIS IN E COLIR01GM052051 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI OSUNA, ROBERT · 2000 to 2003
$1.0M
REGULATION AND FUNCTION OF FIS IN E COLIR29GM052051 · NIGMS · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI OSUNA, ROBERT · 1995 to 1999
–
NIGMS NIH HHS GM52051NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM052051NIGMS NIH HHS R29 GM052051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fis is a nucleoid-associated protein that interacts with poorly related DNA sequences with a high degree of specificity. A difference of more than 3 orders of magnitude in apparent Kd values was observed between specific (Kd, approximately 1 to 4 nM) and nonspecific (Kd, approximately 4 microM) DNA binding. To examine the contributions of Fis residues to the high-affinity binding at different DNA sequences, 13 alanine substitutions were generated in or near the Fis helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif, and the resulting proteins were purified. In vitro binding assays at three different Fis sites (fis P II, hin distal, and lambda attR) revealed that R85, T87, R89, K90, and K91 played major roles in high-affinity DNA binding and that R85, T87, and K90 were consistently vital for binding to all three sites. Other residues made variable contributions to binding, depending on the binding site. N84 was required only for binding to the lambda attR Fis site, and the role of R89 was dramatically altered by the lambda attR DNA flanking sequence. The effects of Fis mutations on fis P II or hin distal site binding in vitro generally correlated with their abilities to mediate fis P repression or DNA inversion in vivo, demonstrating that the in vitro DNA-binding effects are relevant in vivo. The results suggest that while Fis is able to recognize a minimal common set of DNA sequence determinants at different binding sites, it is also equipped with a number of residues that contribute to the binding strength, some of which play variable roles.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceAmino Acid SubstitutionAttachment Sites, MicrobiologicalBase SequenceDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsFactor For Inversion Stimulation ProteinGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHelix-Turn-Helix MotifsMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutation, MissenseProtein BindingRecombination, GeneticDNA, BacterialDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsFactor For Inversion Stimulation ProteinFis protein, E coliTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID16513738
PMCPMC1428148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.