ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2006
Content of invitations for publicly funded screening mammography.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deaths and cardiopulmonary events following colorectal cancer screening-A systematic review with meta-analyses.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Screening for breast cancer with mammography.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Crowd-figure-pictograms improve women's knowledge about mammography screening: results from a randomised controlled trial.BMC research notes · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Using an informed consent in mammography screening: a randomized trial.Cancer medicine · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Trial
- Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): randomised trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Trial
- What is the point: will screening mammography save my life?BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2009Trial
- Impact of an informed choice invitation on uptake of screening for diabetes in primary care (DICISION): trial protocol.BMC public health · 2009Trial
- Article
- Questioning 'Informed Choice' in Medical Screening: The Role of Neoliberal Rhetoric, Culture, and Social Context.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Quality of Informed Consent in Mammography Screening-The Polish Experience.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- [Health Professionals expectations' about the benefit of regular Primary Care interventions].Atencion primaria · 2022Article
- Women's conceptual knowledge about breast cancer screening and overdiagnosis in Norway: a cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Health information provision, health knowledge and health behaviours: Evidence from breast cancer screening.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.