ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
SCOWLP: a web-based database for detailed characterization and visualization of protein interfaces.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dockground resource for protein recognition studies.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
- Dockground: A comprehensive data resource for modeling of protein complexes.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design.Chemical biology & drug design · 2016Article
- Computational Prediction of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks: Algo-rithms and Resources.Current genomics · 2013Article
- Computational study and peptide inhibitors design for the CDK9 - cyclin T1 complex.Journal of molecular modeling · 2013Article
- 2P2Idb: a structural database dedicated to orthosteric modulation of protein-protein interactions.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
- PBSword: a web server for searching similar protein-protein binding sites.Nucleic acids research · 2012Article
- SCOWLP update: 3D classification of protein-protein, -peptide, -saccharide and -nucleic acid interactions, and structure-based binding inferences across folds.BMC bioinformatics · 2011Article
- Docking glycosaminoglycans to proteins: analysis of solvent inclusion.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2011Article
- Oligomeric interfaces under the lens: gemini.PloS one · 2010Article
- Role of interfacial water molecules in proline-rich ligand recognition by the Src homology 3 domain of Abl.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- A survey of available tools and web servers for analysis of protein-protein interactions and interfaces.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Analysis of the impact of solvent on contacts prediction in proteins.BMC structural biology · 2009Article
- VASCo: computation and visualization of annotated protein surface contacts.BMC bioinformatics · 2009Article
- Architectures and functional coverage of protein-protein interfaces.Journal of molecular biology · 2008Article
- SCOWLP classification: structural comparison and analysis of protein binding regions.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently there is a strong need for methods that help to obtain an accurate description of protein interfaces in order to be able to understand the principles that govern molecular recognition and protein function. Many of the recent efforts to computationally identify and characterize protein networks extract protein interaction information at atomic resolution from the PDB. However, they pay none or little attention to small protein ligands and solvent. They are key components and mediators of protein interactions and fundamental for a complete description of protein interfaces. Interactome profiling requires the development of computational tools to extract and analyze protein-protein, protein-ligand and detailed solvent interaction information from the PDB in an automatic and comparative fashion. Adding this information to the existing one on protein-protein interactions will allow us to better understand protein interaction networks and protein function. DESCRIPTION: SCOWLP (Structural Characterization Of Water, Ligands and Proteins) is a user-friendly and publicly accessible web-based relational database for detailed characterization and visualization of the PDB protein interfaces. The SCOWLP database includes proteins, peptidic-ligands and interface water molecules as descriptors of protein interfaces. It contains currently 74,907 protein interfaces and 2,093,976 residue-residue interactions formed by 60,664 structural units (protein domains and peptidic-ligands) and their interacting solvent. The SCOWLP web-server allows detailed structural analysis and comparisons of protein interfaces at atomic level by text query of PDB codes and/or by navigating a SCOP-based tree. It includes a visualization tool to interactively display the interfaces and label interacting residues and interface solvent by atomic physicochemical properties. SCOWLP is automatically updated with every SCOP release.
conclusionSCOWLP enriches substantially the description of protein interfaces by adding detailed interface information of peptidic-ligands and solvent to the existing protein-protein interaction databases. SCOWLP may be of interest to many structural bioinformaticians. It provides a platform for automatic global mapping of protein interfaces at atomic level, representing a useful tool for classification of protein interfaces, protein binding comparative studies, reconstruction of protein complexes and understanding protein networks. The web-server with the database and its additional summary tables used for our analysis are available at http://www.scowlp.org.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.