Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16511688›Full record

ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2006

[Curative vs palliative strategies in locoregional recurrence of gastrointestinal malignancies].

J R Siewert, F Lordick, K Ott, B L D M Brücher, R Rosenberg

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Peritoneal carcinomatosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2013
    Review
  2. Gastric cancer: surgery in 2011.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2011
    Review
  3. [Neoadjuvant therapy in the upper gastro-intestinal tract. Gastric cancer from a surgical viewpoint].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2009
    Review
  4. [Response prediction--early response evaluation. Consequences for surgical oncology].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2006
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J R SiewertChirurgische Klinik Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675 München. siewert@nt1.chir.med.tu-muenchen.de
F Lordick
K Ott
B L D M Brücher
R Rosenberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locoregional recurrence is a relevant problem in surgical oncology. Intraluminal local relapse only occurs when the primary resection is carried through with inappropriate safety margins. If possible, a second surgical resection with wider margins is the treatment of choice. When the primary resection was appropriately done, extraluminal relapse in the original tumor bed indicates the primary tumor was already in an advanced stage. The indication for a second resection must be considered carefully. A realistic prospect of long-term tumor control exists only when the second resection yields tumor-free margins and is combined with chemo- and radiotherapy. There is usually no curative treatment option for recurrences in the draining lymph node region, the so-called fourth dimension.

Indexed as

Palliative CareCombined Modality TherapyGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualNeoplasm StagingPrognosisReoperation

Identifiers

PMID16511688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.