Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16511587›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2006

Going nuclear in metabolic and cardiovascular disease.

Christopher K Glass

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Brain activity of anandamide: a rewarding bliss?Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2019
    Review
  6. Nuclear receptors in vascular biology.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Altered mitochondrial apoptotic pathway in placentas from undernourished rat gestations.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2011
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christopher K GlassDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Department of Medicine, UCSD, La Jolla, California 92093-0651, USA. cglass@ucsd.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estrogen receptors, PPARs, and liver X receptors are members of the nuclear receptor superfamily of ligand-dependent transcription factors that regulate diverse aspects of development and homeostasis. Recent studies of the biologic roles of these receptors and their mechanisms of action have significantly advanced our understanding of transcriptional programs that control lipid and carbohydrate metabolism, immunity and inflammation, and wound repair. These findings provide insights into the therapeutic actions of existing drugs that target nuclear receptors and raise new possibilities for development of safer, more effective drugs for the prevention and treatment of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. In this introduction to this Review series, underlying mechanisms that enable nuclear receptors to positively and negatively regulate gene expression are presented as background to the focused reviews on estrogen receptors, PPARs, liver X receptors, and the PPARgamma coactivator-1 (PGC-1) family of coactivators.

Indexed as

AnimalsCardiovascular DiseasesHumansMetabolic DiseasesReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearReceptors, Cytoplasmic and Nuclear

Identifiers

PMID16511587
PMCPMC1386116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.