Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16510731›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Functional analysis of circadian pacemaker neurons in Drosophila melanogaster.

Dirk Rieger, Orie Thomas Shafer, Kenji Tomioka, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 223 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Journal of biological rhythms · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A functional clock in only two dorsal clock neurons is sufficient to restore the basal circadian activity pattern ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A four-oscillator model of seasonally adapted morning and evening activities in Drosophila melanogaster.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A PDZ scaffolding/CaM-mediated pathway in Cryptochrome signaling.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  20. Life science alliance · 2024
    Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Dirk RiegerUniversity of Regensburg, Institute of Zoology, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.
Orie Thomas Shafer
Kenji Tomioka
Charlotte Helfrich-Förster
University of Regensburg · DEOkayama University of Science · JPWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well known, but how multiple clocks within one organism generate a structured rhythmic output remains a mystery. Many animals show bimodal activity rhythms with morning (M) and evening (E) activity bouts. One long-standing model assumes that two mutually coupled oscillators underlie these bouts and show different sensitivities to light. Three groups of lateral neurons (LN) and three groups of dorsal neurons govern behavioral rhythmicity of Drosophila. Recent data suggest that two groups of the LN (the ventral subset of the small LN cells and the dorsal subset of LN cells) are plausible candidates for the M and E oscillator, respectively. We provide evidence that these neuronal groups respond differently to light and can be completely desynchronized from one another by constant light, leading to two activity components that free-run with different periods. As expected, a long-period component started from the E activity bout. However, a short-period component originated not exclusively from the morning peak but more prominently from the evening peak. This reveals an interesting deviation from the original Pittendrigh and Daan (1976) model and suggests that a subgroup of the ventral subset of the small LN acts as "main" oscillator controlling M and E activity bouts in Drosophila.

Indexed as

PeriodicityAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedBehavior, AnimalBrainCircadian RhythmCryptochromesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsGene ExpressionImmunohistochemistryLightMotor ActivityNeuronsNeuropeptidescry protein, DrosophilaCryptochromesDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsNeuropeptidesNuclear Proteinspdf protein, DrosophilaPeriod Circadian ProteinsPER protein, DrosophilaReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledtim protein, Drosophila

Identifiers

PMID16510731
PMCPMC6793667
OpenAlexW2021500478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.