Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16510722›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Operant conditioning of gill withdrawal in Aplysia.

Robert D Hawkins, Gregory A Clark, Eric R Kandel

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Direct instrumental conditioning of neural activity using functional magnetic resonance imaging-derived reward feedback.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Yin and Yang of Sleep and Attention.Trends in neurosciences · 2015
    Review
  6. Associative learning in invertebrates.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Orbitofrontal reality filtering.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Behavioral and in vitro correlates of compulsive-like food seeking induced by operant conditioning in Aplysia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Neural changes after operant conditioning of the aerial respiratory behavior in Lymnaea stagnalis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1999
    Article
  17. Contingent-dependent enhancement of rhythmic motor patterns: an in vitro analog of operant conditioning.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 1997
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert D HawkinsCenter for Neurobiology and Behavior, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA. rdh1@columbia.edu
Gregory A Clark
Eric R Kandel

Funding

LEARNING MECHANISMS IN THE ABDOMINAL GANGLIONR01MH026212 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI HAWKINS, ROBERT D · 1985 to 2003
$829k
NIMH NIH HHS MH26212
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A basic question in neuroscience is how different forms of learning are related. To further address that question, we examined whether gill withdrawal in Aplysia, which has already been studied extensively for neuronal mechanisms contributing to habituation, sensitization, and classical conditioning, also undergoes operant conditioning. Animals were run in pairs. During the initial training period, the contingent (experimental) animal received a siphon shock each time its gill relaxed below a criterion level, and the yoked control animal received a shock whenever the experimental animal did, regardless of its own gill position. This was followed by an extinction period when there was no shock, a retraining period when both animals were contingent, and another extinction period. The experimental animals spent more time with their gills contracted above the criterion level than did the control animals during each period, demonstrating operant conditioning. The type of gill behavior modified by learning shifted over time: the experimental animals had a larger increase in the frequency and duration of spontaneous contractions than did the control animals during the first but not the last extinction period and a larger increase in the level of tonic contraction during the last but not the first extinction period. Because many of the neurons controlling spontaneous and tonic gill withdrawal have already been identified, it should now be possible to examine the cellular locus and mechanism of operant conditioning and compare them with those for other forms of learning of the same behavior.

Indexed as

AnimalsAplysiaBehavior, AnimalConditioning, OperantGillsModels, BiologicalPhysical StimulationReaction Time

Identifiers

PMID16510722
PMCPMC6793659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.