Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16510046›Full record

ReviewCurrent atherosclerosis reports2006

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: the Achilles' heel of long-term survival after cardiac transplantation.

Amandeep Dhaliwal, Vinay Thohan

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current atherosclerosis reports, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Characterization of immune responses to cardiac self-antigens myosin and vimentin in human cardiac allograft recipients with antibody-mediated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2010
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amandeep DhaliwalMethodist DeBakey Heart Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Vinay Thohan
Houston Methodist · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past 40 years, cardiac transplantation has evolved as the single best long-term option for eligible candidates with end-stage heart failure. Approximately 2000 transplants are performed annually in the United States, and with the institution of calcineurin-based immunotherapy, surveillance biopsies, and programmatic-based patient care, life expectancy at 1 and 12 years is 85% and 50%, respectively. Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the number one cause of death after the first year of transplantation. The incidence of CAV remains as high as 50% at 5 years, with life expectancy significantly abbreviated once it is recognized. Although current immunotherapy has reduced the likelihood of cellular rejection, it has not impacted CAV substantially. Better treatment of established risk factors and the advent of newer antiproliferative immunotherapy may hold promise in treating CAV. However, future therapies must address the multitude of mechanisms underlying CAV. This manuscript reviews the pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, screening, and diagnostic strategies for cardiac allograft vasculopathy while emphasizing current treatment paradigms designed to stave off or retard the progression of CAV.

Indexed as

Coronary DiseaseFollow-Up StudiesHeart FailureHeart TransplantationHumansIncidencePrognosisRisk FactorsSurvival RateTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID16510046
OpenAlexW2048269731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.