ArticleBMC bioinformatics2006
A multivariate prediction model for microarray cross-hybridization.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of post-translational modification-related biomarkers in ischemic stroke using bioinformatics and machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Feasibility of developing reliable gene expression modules from FFPE derived RNA profiled on Affymetrix arrays.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
- Compressive sensing DNA microarrays.EURASIP journal on bioinformatics & systems biology · 2009Article
- CrossHybDetector: detection of cross-hybridization events in DNA microarray experiments.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Origin of co-expression patterns in E. coli and S. cerevisiae emerging from reverse engineering algorithms.PloS one · 2008Article
- Specificity of DNA microarray hybridization: characterization, effectors and approaches for data correction.Nucleic acids research · 2008Review
- In situ analysis of cross-hybridisation on microarrays and the inference of expression correlation.BMC bioinformatics · 2007Article
- Optimization of cDNA microarrays procedures using criteria that do not rely on external standards.BMC genomics · 2007Article
- Optimization and clinical validation of a pathogen detection microarray.Genome biology · 2007Article
- Improvement in the reproducibility and accuracy of DNA microarray quantification by optimizing hybridization conditions.BMC bioinformatics · 2006Article
- Pollution-affected fish hepatic transcriptome and its expression patterns on exposure to cadmium.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)Article
- A cDNA microarray for Crassostrea virginica and C. gigas.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)Article
- Estimating the efficiency of fish cross-species cDNA microarray hybridization.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundExpression microarray analysis is one of the most popular molecular diagnostic techniques in the post-genomic era. However, this technique faces the fundamental problem of potential cross-hybridization. This is a pervasive problem for both oligonucleotide and cDNA microarrays; it is considered particularly problematic for the latter. No comprehensive multivariate predictive modeling has been performed to understand how multiple variables contribute to (cross-) hybridization.
resultsWe propose a systematic search strategy using multiple multivariate models [multiple linear regressions, regression trees, and artificial neural network analyses (ANNs)] to select an effective set of predictors for hybridization. We validate this approach on a set of DNA microarrays with cytochrome p450 family genes. The performance of our multiple multivariate models is compared with that of a recently proposed third-order polynomial regression method that uses percent identity as the sole predictor. All multivariate models agree that the 'most contiguous base pairs between probe and target sequences,' rather than percent identity, is the best univariate predictor. The predictive power is improved by inclusion of additional nonlinear effects, in particular target GC content, when regression trees or ANNs are used.
conclusionA systematic multivariate approach is provided to assess the importance of multiple sequence features for hybridization and of relationships among these features. This approach can easily be applied to larger datasets. This will allow future developments of generalized hybridization models that will be able to correct for false-positive cross-hybridization signals in expression experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.