ReviewDer Anaesthesist2006
[Perioperative fluid management: an analysis of the present situation].
Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Anesthesia for medical students : A brief guide to practical anesthesia in adults with a web-based video illustration].Der Anaesthesist · 2016Review
- Anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery followed by hyperthermic intrathoracic chemotherapy perfusion.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2014Article
- [Haemodynamic monitoring in the perioperative phase. Available systems, practical application and clinical data].Der Anaesthesist · 2009Review
- [Importance of anesthesia in multimodal oncologic therapeutical concepts].Der Anaesthesist · 2006Review
- [Perioperative fluid management].Der Anaesthesist · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal perioperative fluid management is still controversial. Besides well known perioperative hypovolaemia, hypervolaemia has an influence on perioperative morbidity and mortality, particularly with regard to the patient's medical history, a reduced cardiac and pulmonal function and the operation itself. The concepts of preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative fluid administration are neither adequately validated, nor sufficiently integrated into a perioperative concept. At the present, moderate fluid administration to improve preoperative and postoperative outcome is safe in minor or medium surgical procedures. High-risk surgical patients benefit from a time-oriented or/and goal-oriented monitored fluid therapy. In the past only little attention has been concentrated on postoperative fluid management, but may be stimulated by the new concepts of fast track surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16508741What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.