Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16507468›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2006

Workgroup report: Implementing a national occupational reproductive research agenda--decade one and beyond.

Christina C Lawson, Barbara Grajewski, George P Daston, Linda M Frazier, Dennis Lynch, Melissa McDiarmid, Eisuke Murono, Sally D Perreault, Wendie A Robbins, Megan A K Ryan and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Christina C LawsonNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226-1998, USA. clawson@cdc.gov
Barbara Grajewski
George P Daston
Linda M Frazier
Dennis Lynch
Melissa McDiarmid
Eisuke Murono
Sally D Perreault
Wendie A Robbins
Megan A K Ryan
Michael Shelby
Elizabeth A Whelan
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health · USEnvironmental Protection Agency · USNational Institutes of Health · USProcter & Gamble (United States) · USUnited States Department of Defense · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · US

Funding

NTP Center/The Evaluation Of Risks To Human ReproductionZ01ES100474 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI SHELBY, MICHAEL · 2002 to 2008
$1.5M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The initial goal of occupational reproductive health research is to effectively study the many toxicants, physical agents, and biomechanical and psychosocial stressors that may constitute reproductive hazards in the workplace. Although the main objective of occupational reproductive researchers and clinicians is to prevent recognized adverse reproductive outcomes, research has expanded to include a broader spectrum of chronic health outcomes potentially affected by reproductive toxicants. To aid in achieving these goals, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, along with its university, federal, industry, and labor colleagues, formed the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) in 1996. NORA resulted in 21 research teams, including the Reproductive Health Research Team (RHRT). In this report, we describe progress made in the last decade by the RHRT and by others in this field, including prioritizing reproductive toxicants for further study; facilitating collaboration among epidemiologists, biologists, and toxicologists; promoting quality exposure assessment in field studies and surveillance; and encouraging the design and conduct of priority occupational reproductive studies. We also describe new tools for screening reproductive toxicants and for analyzing mode of action. We recommend considering outcomes such as menopause and latent adverse effects for further study, as well as including exposures such as shift work and nanomaterials. We describe a broad domain of scholarship activities where a cohesive system of organized and aligned work activities integrates 10 years of team efforts and provides guidance for future research.

Indexed as

Occupational HealthDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHazardous SubstancesHumansNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S.Occupational ExposureReproductionReproductive MedicineResearchUnited StatesHazardous Substances

Identifiers

PMID16507468
PMCPMC1392239
OpenAlexW2066095789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.