Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16507155›Full record

ArticleJournal of biology2006

Global analysis of X-chromosome dosage compensation.

Vaijayanti Gupta, Michael Parisi, David Sturgill, Rachel Nuttall, Michael Doctolero, Olga K Dudko, James D Malley, P Scott Eastman, Brian Oliver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 194 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
194citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

194 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Compensation of gene dosage on the mammalian X.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Dosage Compensation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Role of Epigenetics in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Dosage compensation inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

134 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vaijayanti GuptaLaboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. vaijayanti@strandls.com
Michael Parisi
David Sturgill
Rachel Nuttall
Michael Doctolero
Olga K Dudko
James D Malley
P Scott Eastman
Brian Oliver

Funding

Drosophila Functional GenomicsZIADK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN · 2009 to 2025
$23.9M
GERMLINE SEX DETERMINATIONZ01DK015600 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI OLIVER, BRIAN C · 1996 to 2008
$949k
Advanced Methods In Statistical GeneticsZIACT000268 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI MALLEY, JAMES D · 2009 to 2013
$481k
INSTRUMENTAL ANALYSISZ01CT000014 · CIT · COMPUTER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, GEORGE H · 1985 to 2008
$408k
STUDIES IN MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICSZ01CT000024 · CIT · COMPUTER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, GEORGE H · 1985 to 2008
$408k
Advanced Methods In Statistical GeneticsZ01CT000268 · CIT · COMPUTER RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY · PI MALLEY, JAMES D · 1999 to 2008
$354k
Instrumental AnalysisZIACT000014 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, GEORGE H · 2009 to 2009
$96k
Studies In Applied Mathematics And StatisticsZIACT000024 · CIT · CENTER FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY · PI WEISS, GEORGE H · 2009 to 2009
$96k
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrosophila melanogaster females have two X chromosomes and two autosome sets (XX;AA), while males have a single X chromosome and two autosome sets (X;AA). Drosophila male somatic cells compensate for a single copy of the X chromosome by deploying male-specific-lethal (MSL) complexes that increase transcription from the X chromosome. Male germ cells lack MSL complexes, indicating that either germline X-chromosome dosage compensation is MSL-independent, or that germ cells do not carry out dosage compensation.

resultsTo investigate whether dosage compensation occurs in germ cells, we directly assayed X-chromosome transcripts using DNA microarrays and show equivalent expression in XX;AA and X;AA germline tissues. In X;AA germ cells, expression from the single X chromosome is about twice that of a single autosome. This mechanism ensures balanced X-chromosome expression between the sexes and, more importantly, it ensures balanced expression between the single X chromosome and the autosome set. Oddly, the inactivation of an X chromosome in mammalian females reduces the effective X-chromosome dose and means that females face the same X-chromosome transcript deficiency as males. Contrary to most current dosage-compensation models, we also show increased X-chromosome expression in X;AA and XX;AA somatic cells of Caenorhabditis elegans and mice.

conclusionDrosophila germ cells compensate for X-chromosome dose. This occurs by equilibrating X-chromosome and autosome expression in X;AA cells. Increased expression of the X chromosome in X;AA individuals appears to be phylogenetically conserved.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticX ChromosomeAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterFemaleGene DosageGene Expression ProfilingMaleMiceOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisOvaryTestisTranscription, Genetic

Identifiers

PMID16507155
PMCPMC1414069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.