Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16507147›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2006

Continuous infusion of ceftazidime in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration: pharmacokinetic evaluation and dose recommendation.

Christophe Mariat, Christophe Venet, François Jehl, Sandrine Mwewa, Vesna Lazarevic, Eric Diconne, Nathalie Fonsale, Anne Carricajo, Stéphane Guyomarc'h, Régine Vermesch and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Parenteral medication use in hospital at home: Challenges and opportunities.American journal of health-system pharmacy : AJHP : official journal of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christophe MariatService de Néphrologie, Hôpital Nord, CHU de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France. christophe.mariat@univ-st-etienne.fr
Christophe Venet
François Jehl
Sandrine Mwewa
Vesna Lazarevic
Eric Diconne
Nathalie Fonsale
Anne Carricajo
Stéphane Guyomarc'h
Régine Vermesch
Gérald Aubert
Roselyne Bidault
Jean-Claude Bertrand
Fabrice Zeni
Hôpital Nord · FRInstitut de Virologie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn seriously infected patients with acute renal failure and who require continuous renal replacement therapy, data on continuous infusion of ceftazidime are lacking. Here we analyzed the pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) in order to identify the optimal dosage in this setting.

methodSeven critically ill patients were prospectively enrolled in the study. CVVHDF was performed using a 0.6 m2 AN69 high-flux membrane and with blood, dialysate and ultrafiltration flow rates of 150 ml/min, 1 l/hour and 1.5 l/hour, respectively. Based on a predicted haemodiafiltration clearance of 32.5 ml/min, all patients received a 2 g loading dose of ceftazidime, followed by a 3 g/day continuous infusion for 72 hours. Serum samples were collected at 0, 3, 15 and 30 minutes and at 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 72 hours; dialysate/ultrafiltrate samples were taken at 2, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48 hours. Ceftazidime concentrations in serum and dialysate/ultrafiltrate were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography.

resultsThe mean (+/- standard deviation) elimination half-life, volume of distribution, area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to 72 hours, and total clearance of ceftazidime were 4 +/- 1 hours, 19 +/- 6 l, 2514 +/- 212 mg/h per l, and 62 +/- 5 ml/min, respectively. The mean serum ceftazidime steady-state concentration was 33.5 mg/l (range 28.8-36.3 mg/l). CVVHDF effectively removed continuously infused ceftazidime, with a sieving coefficient and haemodiafiltration clearance of 0.81 +/- 0.11 and 33.6 +/- 4 mg/l, respectively.

conclusionWe conclude that a dosing regimen of 3 g/day ceftazidime, by continuous infusion, following a 2 g loading dose, results in serum concentrations more than four times the minimum inhibitory concentration for all susceptible pathogens, and we recommend this regimen in critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessHemodiafiltrationAcute Kidney InjuryAdultAgedCeftazidimeDrug Administration ScheduleHumansInfusions, IntravenousMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesCeftazidime

Identifiers

PMID16507147
PMCPMC1550796
OpenAlexW1657197321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.