Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16506005›Full record

Trial reportExperimental brain research2006

Increased spinal excitability does not offset central activation failure.

J M Kalmar, C Del Balso, E Cafarelli

Abstract readClinical Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Experimental brain research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2017
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J M KalmarDepartment of Biology, Rm 346 Bethune College, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
C Del Balso
E Cafarelli
York University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We hypothesized that if reduced spinal excitability contributes to central activation failure, then a caffeine-induced increase in spinal excitability would enhance postfatigue maximal voluntary activation and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Ten male volunteer subjects attended two laboratory sessions separated by at least 1 week. Contractile and electrical properties were assessed before, and 1 h after oral administration of caffeine (6 mg/kg) or placebo (all-purpose flour), and again following a fatigue protocol. The slope of the H reflex recruitment curve, normalized to that of the M wave (H(slp)/M(slp)), was used to estimate spinal excitability. Maximal voluntary activation was assessed using maximal EMG (EMG(max)) and twitch interpolation. Postfatigue, MVC torque declined (P<0.05) to 75.2+/-12.7 and 70.2+/-9.3% of the prefatigue values in the placebo (PL) and caffeine (CF) trials, respectively, and remained depressed throughout the recovery period. This was accompanied by a decline in % activation (P<0.05) from 99.6+/-0.3% (PL) and 99.8+/-0.3% (CF) to 94.8+/-3.5% (PL) and 95.3+/-5.0% (CF), indicating the presence of central activation failure. Caffeine offset the decline in H(slp)/M(slp )observed in the placebo trial (P<0.05), but it did not prevent the decline in maximal voluntary activation or MVC torque. Furthermore, although the decline in spinal excitability was correlated to the decline in EMG(max) (r=0.55, P<0.05) it was not correlated with the decline in % activation or MVC torque. Thus a fatigue-induced decline in spinal excitability did not limit maximal activation.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAdultCaffeineCentral Nervous SystemCentral Nervous System StimulantsData Interpretation, StatisticalElectric StimulationElectromyographyFatigueH-ReflexHumansMaleMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalSpineCaffeineCentral Nervous System Stimulants

Identifiers

PMID16506005
OpenAlexW2093489460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.