ArticleJournal of biomolecular NMR2006
Automated protein NMR structure determination in crude cell-extract.
Article in Journal of biomolecular NMR, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modern Technologies of Solution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Three-dimensional Structure Determination of Proteins Open Avenues for Life Scientists.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2017Review
- Protein nuclear magnetic resonance under physiological conditions.Biochemistry · 2009Article
- In-cell biochemistry using NMR spectroscopy.PloS one · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A fully automated, NOE-based NMR structure determination of a uniformly 13C,15N-labeled protein was achieved in crude cell-extract, without purification of the overexpressed protein. Essentially complete sequence-specific assignments were obtained using triple resonance experiments, based on the high intensity of the resonances from the overexpressed protein relative to those of the background. For the collection of NOE distance constraints, efficient discrimination between NOE cross peaks from the target protein and background signals was achieved using the programs ATNOS and CANDID. In the iterative ATNOS/CANDID procedure, the identification of the desired protein NOEs is initially guided by the self-consistency of the protein NOE-network. Although the intensities of the signals in this network vary over a wide range, and are in many instances comparable to or smaller than those of the background, the first cycle of calculations resulted in the correct global polypeptide fold, and the structure was then refined in six subsequent cycles using the intermediate NMR structures for additional guidance. The experience gained with this work demonstrates that the ATNOS/CANDID procedure for automatic protein structure determination is highly robust and reliable in the presence of intense background signals, and might thus also represent a platform for future protein structure determinations in physiological fluids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16505959What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.