Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16504063›Full record

ArticleBMC microbiology2006

Molecular targets for rapid identification of Brucella spp.

Vladyslava G Ratushna, David M Sturgill, Sheela Ramamoorthy, Sherry A Reichow, Yongqun He, Raju Lathigra, Nammalwar Sriranganathan, Shirley M Halling, Stephen M Boyle, Cynthia J Gibas

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC microbiology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Microorganisms · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Specific Detection and Differentiation BetweenFrontiers in veterinary science · 2020
    Article
  8. The Role of the Flagellar Protein FlgJ in the Virulence ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  9. Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Brucellosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019
    Review
  10. Multivalent Fusion DNA Vaccine againstBioMed research international · 2017
    Article
  11. Swine brucellosis: current perspectives.Veterinary medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Vladyslava G RatushnaDepartment of Computer Science, College of Information Technology, University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA. vgratush@uncc.edu
David M Sturgill
Sheela Ramamoorthy
Sherry A Reichow
Yongqun He
Raju Lathigra
Nammalwar Sriranganathan
Shirley M Halling
Stephen M Boyle
Cynthia J Gibas
Virginia–Maryland College of Veterinary Medicine · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · USUnited States Department of Agriculture · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USVirginia Tech · USWalter Reed Army Institute of Research · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrucella is an intracellular pathogen capable of infecting animals and humans. There are six recognized species of Brucella that differ in their host preference. The genomes of the three Brucella species have been recently sequenced. Comparison of the three revealed over 98% sequence similarity at the protein level and enabled computational identification of common and differentiating genes. We validated these computational predictions and examined the expression patterns of the putative unique and differentiating genes, using genomic and reverse transcription PCR. We then screened a set of differentiating genes against classical Brucella biovars and showed the applicability of these regions in the design of diagnostic tests.

resultsWe have identified and tested set of molecular targets that are associated in unique patterns with each of the sequenced Brucella spp. A comprehensive comparison was made among the published genome sequences of B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis. The comparison confirmed published differences between the three Brucella genomes, and identified subsets of features that were predicted to be of interest in a functional comparison of B. melitensis and B. suis to B. abortus. Differentiating sequence regions from B. abortus, B. melitensis and B. suis were used to develop PCR primers to test for the existence and in vitro transcription of these genes in these species. Only B. suis is found to have a significant number of unique genes, but combinations of genes and regions that exist in only two out of three genomes and are therefore useful for diagnostics were identified and confirmed.

conclusionAlthough not all of the differentiating genes identified were transcribed under steady state conditions, a group of genes sufficient to discriminate unambiguously between B. suis, B. melitensis, and B. abortus was identified. We present an overview of these genomic differences and the use of these features to discriminate among a number of Brucella biovars.

Indexed as

Bacterial Typing TechniquesBrucellaComputational BiologyGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationGenome, BacterialPolymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, BacterialSequence Analysis, DNARNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID16504063
PMCPMC1413539
OpenAlexW2090834116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.