Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16500976›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Entropy-driven genome organization.

Davide Marenduzzo, Cristian Micheletti, Peter R Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Understanding and Simulating the Dynamics of a Polymer-Like Chromatin.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Consistencies and contradictions in different polymer models of chromatin architecture.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  11. DNA sliding and loop formation byBiochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022
    Article
  12. Entropy Perspectives of Molecular and Evolutionary Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Davide MarenduzzoMathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Cristian Micheletti
Peter R Cook

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA and RNA polymerases active on bacterial and human genomes in the crowded environment of a cell are modeled as beads spaced along a string. Aggregation of the large polymerizing complexes increases the entropy of the system through an increase in entropy of the many small crowding molecules; this occurs despite the entropic costs of looping the intervening DNA. Results of a quantitative cost/benefit analysis are consistent with observations that active polymerases cluster into replication and transcription "factories" in both pro- and eukaryotes. We conclude that the second law of thermodynamics acts through nonspecific entropic forces between engaged polymerases to drive the self-organization of genomes into loops containing several thousands (and sometimes millions) of basepairs.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, ChemicalModels, MolecularComputer SimulationDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA-Directed RNA PolymerasesEntropyNucleic Acid ConformationDNADNA-Directed DNA PolymeraseDNA-Directed RNA Polymerases

Identifiers

PMID16500976
PMCPMC1440752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.