Evidence map›Paper›PMID 16500961›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2006

Viscoelastic retraction of single living stress fibers and its impact on cell shape, cytoskeletal organization, and extracellular matrix mechanics.

Sanjay Kumar, Iva Z Maxwell, Alexander Heisterkamp, Thomas R Polte, Tanmay P Lele, Matthew Salanga, Eric Mazur, Donald E Ingber

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 289 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 674 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Selection of Force Sensors forTissue engineering. Part A · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanjay KumarVascular Biology Program, Department of Pathology, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115-5737, USA.
Iva Z Maxwell
Alexander Heisterkamp
Thomas R Polte
Tanmay P Lele
Matthew Salanga
Eric Mazur
Donald E Ingber
Harvard University · USBoston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

TUMOR DORMANCY INDUCED BY BLOCKED ANGIOGENESISP01CA045548 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI FOLKMAN, JUDAH · 1987 to 2011
$22.6M
Intermediate filament control of neuronal mechanicsF32NS048669 · NINDS · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL BOSTON · PI KUMAR, SANJAY · 2004 to 2005
$60k
NCI NIH HHS CA45548NCI NIH HHS P01 CA045548NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS048669NINDS NIH HHS F32-NS048669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells change their form and function by assembling actin stress fibers at their base and exerting traction forces on their extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesions. Individual stress fibers are thought to be actively tensed by the action of actomyosin motors and to function as elastic cables that structurally reinforce the basal portion of the cytoskeleton; however, these principles have not been directly tested in living cells, and their significance for overall cell shape control is poorly understood. Here we combine a laser nanoscissor, traction force microscopy, and fluorescence photobleaching methods to confirm that stress fibers in living cells behave as viscoelastic cables that are tensed through the action of actomyosin motors, to quantify their retraction kinetics in situ, and to explore their contribution to overall mechanical stability of the cell and interconnected ECM. These studies reveal that viscoelastic recoil of individual stress fibers after laser severing is partially slowed by inhibition of Rho-associated kinase and virtually abolished by direct inhibition of myosin light chain kinase. Importantly, cells cultured on stiff ECM substrates can tolerate disruption of multiple stress fibers with negligible overall change in cell shape, whereas disruption of a single stress fiber in cells anchored to compliant ECM substrates compromises the entire cellular force balance, induces cytoskeletal rearrangements, and produces ECM retraction many microns away from the site of incision; this results in large-scale changes of cell shape (> 5% elongation). In addition to revealing fundamental insight into the mechanical properties and cell shape contributions of individual stress fibers and confirming that the ECM is effectively a physical extension of the cell and cytoskeleton, the technologies described here offer a novel approach to spatially map the cytoskeletal mechanics of living cells on the nanoscale.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsBiomechanical PhenomenaCattleCells, CulturedCell SizeComputer SimulationCytoskeletonElasticityEndothelial CellsExtracellular MatrixMechanotransduction, CellularStress FibersStress, MechanicalViscosity

Identifiers

PMID16500961
PMCPMC1440757
OpenAlexW2171906125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.