ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2006
The histological appearance of oesophageal adenocarcinoma--an analysis based on 215 resection specimens.
Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Tumor Regression on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Surgically Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.Annals of surgical oncology · 2022Article
- EBV-infection in cardiac and non-cardiac gastric adenocarcinomas is associated with promoter methylation of p16, p14 and APC, but not hMLH1.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study was performed to determine whether the histopathological appearance of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (AC) differs significantly from that of cardiac or gastric AC. Therefore, HE-stained slides of 215 primarily resected oesophageal AC, 108 cardiac and 184 gastric AC were classified according to a variety of clinico-pathologic parameters. According to Lauren's classification, oesophageal AC (1.4%) less frequently belonged to the diffuse type than cardiac (2.8%) and gastric AC (23.9%; p<0.0001). Tubular and papillary AC, as defined by the WHO classification, were more frequent among oesophageal (94.4%) than among cardiac (87.0%) and gastric AC (59.2%; p<0.0001). Solid carcinomas, according to Carneiro's classification, were less frequent among oesophageal (2.8%) than among cardiac (10.2%) and gastric AC (9.2%; p<0.0001). Oesophageal AC were graded more frequently G1/G2 (53.9%) than cardiac (30.6%) and gastric AC (27.7%; p<0.0001). Among oesophageal AC, Lauren's classification (p=0.0067), Carneiro's classification (p=0.0170), tumour grade (p=0.0005), lymphatic vessel invasion (p<0.0001) but not WHO classification were histological predictors of postoperative survival. In conclusion, oesophageal AC displays the same histological spectrum as cardiac and gastric AC. However, the relative proportion of differentiated, gland-forming carcinomas is significantly more frequent in the oesophagus than in the cardia and in the stomach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
16498532What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.